Justia 10 - Badge
Super Lawyers - Badge
Avvo 10 / Top Attorney - Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association 1911 - Badge
Top Rated Lawyer 2023 - Badge
Three Best Rated
Stephen Neyman - Elite Lawyers-Criminal Defense 2026 Badge

Search & Seizure

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights protects all citizens from unlawful and unwarranted searches and seizures. This means that law enforcement officials are prohibited from conducting a search and seizure of your body, home, or property unless:

  1. They have probable cause to believe an illegal activity is occurring, or
  2. They have a court-issued search warrant

If a police officer, state trooper, or a state or federal law enforcement official searches your property without a valid search warrant or without probable cause, any evidence he/she collects cannot be used against you in court.

If you have been arrested after a law enforcement official conducted a search and seizure of your home, body, or property, and you were consequently arrested, it’s important to contact an experienced Boston criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible. In these types of situations time is of the essence! Massachusetts criminal defense attorney Stephen Neyman will review your case and immediately begin investigating the actions leading up to your arrest. If he suspects the police or investigative agency acted illegally or unlawfully in searching you or your property he will bring it to the attention of the judge, and argue to have the evidence dismissed from court.

Motions to Suppress: The Best Weapon You Have to Attack an Illegal Search and Seizure in Massachusetts

Any experienced criminal defense lawyer will tell you that there is not better tool for attacking the district attorney’s case than through a motion to suppress evidence. Anytime there is a stop, or a search, or a seizure that first thing that we think of is the legality of the police action. If the search was conducted pursuant to a search warrant we find ways to attack the affidavit that was filed to obtain the search warrant. If there was no warrant we look to see if one should have been applied for. We will visit the scene to determine if the representations of the police officer are supported by the surrounding environment; i.e. could he really have seen what he says he saw or was he in fact lying and conducting his search improperly? Successful motions to suppress result in the exclusion of evidence. Usually, without that evidence the district attorney cannot proceed with his case. In other words, the case will get dismissed.

Contact Boston, Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney

The right you have against unlawful searches and seizures should never be violated! If state or federal law enforcement officials have violated your constitutional rights, Attorney Stephen Neyman will stand up for your rights and vigorously defend you in court. Mr. Neyman is has over 20 years of experience handling cases involving search and seizure law, and has successfully defended countless clients with cases of this nature throughout his career. As a highly skilled and experienced Boston criminal defense attorney, Mr. Neyman will aggressively contest any evidence submitted by the prosecution that was obtained during an unlawful search and seizure. Mr. Neyman is 100% committed to protecting your rights, fighting your charges, and helping you win your case!

If you require the services of an experienced, dependable, and knowledgeable Boston, Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer with a thorough understanding of state and federal search and seizure laws, please contact the Law Offices of Stephen Neyman for a free consultation at 617-263-6800 or contact us online.

Case Results » Search & Seizure

Motion to Suppress Drugs Seized During Search of Storage Facility and House Allowed July 3, 2026 Our client is charged with trafficking cocaine in excess of 200 grams, G.L. c. 94C section 32E, 3 counts of trafficking fentanyl , G.L. c. 94C section 32E and distribution of cocaine, G.L. c. 94C section 32A. The district attorney alleged that in April of 2025 police in a southeastern Massachusetts obtained a warrant to track movement of the defendant’s car. While following he vehicle he was observed engaging in several hand to hand sales to an informant. He was also observed leaving a particular residence prior to and subsequent to these deals. Additionally, the tracking device showed him frequently vesting a storage facility. Based on this information, search warrants for the residence and the storage facility were granted. The searches revealed quantities of cocaine in excess of 200 grams and quantities of fentanyl in excess of 36 grams. If convicted he faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 12 and 5 years respectively. Our office challenged the constitutionality of the search warrants. We believed that case law did not support the issuance of the search warrants for the home and the storage facility. We filed and argued a motion to suppress asserting that challenge. The judge agreed. The drugs seized as a result of the search warrants for the home and the storage facility are now suppressed. Read More in Drug Crimes

Motion to Suppress Unlawful Possession of a Firearm Against Accountant Allowed January 2, 2026 Several months ago an accountant was driving through Boston around 10:00 at night. A police officer observed his license plate to be obscured by a license plate cover. The officer stopped the man and learned that his driver’s license had been suspended. This is an arrestable offense in Massachusetts. The officer then conducted an inventory search of the vehicle. During the search he located a handgun in a backpack containing our client’s personal belongings. The man did not have a license to carry in accordance with Massachusetts law. He was arrested and charged with unlawful possession of a firearm under G.L. c. 269 section 10(a). This is a felony in Massachusetts that carries a mandatory minimum 18 month sentence. Several weeks ago we had a hearing on a motion to suppress the search as being unlawful. The judge agreed with our position and the motion was allowed. The gun is suppressed and not allowed in evidence.  Read More in Search and Seizure

Motion to Suppress Search Allowed and All Drugs Seized Excluded as Evidence After Successful Evidentiary Hearing March 1, 2024 In March of last year our client’s mother drove past his house and observed him acting peculiar and on the roof of his home. She called her husband who in turn called the police. The police arrived to conduct a “wellness” check. When they got to the home the woman said that her son was fine and that the situation had abated. That notwithstanding, the officers went upstairs and observed the defendant with a large bag of drugs on his chest. He was arrested and charged with trafficking fentanyl, a Class A drug in Massachusetts. This is a violation of G.L. c. 94C section 32E. Our client was facing significant mandatory state prison time. Attorney Neyman filed a motion to suppress the search claiming that the police had no right to conduct this search. Our client’s mother testified that she never gave consent for the search and that the officers, without her consent, searched the home. A judge allowed our motion and the search and seizure was found to be unlawful. Read More in Search and Seizure

Location

Boston Office
10 Tremont St #602

Boston, MA 02108

Phone: 617-263-6800 Fax: 888-266-1781

Client Reviews

We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case.

A.C.

I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career.

Melissa C. Cold

My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job.

Bart L. S.

The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life.

Jacquille D. Brockton

In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record.

Paul W. Boston

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Over 20 Years of Experience

Fill out the contact form or call us at 617-263-6800 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message