COVID-19 UPDATE: WORKING FOR YOU IN THESE CHALLENGING TIMES
Justia Lawyer Rating
Super Lawyers Badge
Avvo Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association

Kidnapping

The crime of kidnapping in Massachusetts is defined under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 26. There are three theories under which the district attorney can proceed when prosecuting a kidnapping case.

Theory #1

Anyone who illegally and forcibly or secretly confines or imprisons someone within the state against his will is guilty of kidnapping and will be punished. There are three elements the district attorney must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone under this theory of kidnapping:

  • He must establish that the defendant lacked authority;
  • He must establish that the defendant forcibly or secretly confined or imprisoned someone within this state. The force can be actual or constructive. There does not actually have to be physical force.
  • That the offense was committed against the victim's will. In other words, the victim cannot have consented to being seized or confined.
Theory #2

Anyone who forcibly carries or sends someone out of the state without having the authority to do so in guilty of kidnapping. To prove someone guilty under the section the prosecutor must prove that:

  • The defendant lacked authority, and;
  • The defendant forcibly carried or sent someone out of this state. In the context of this crime the word "forcibly" means that the act was carried out through force. It is sufficient that the alleged victim is subdued by a display of potential force.
Theory #3

Anyone who forcibly seizes and confines someone with the intent that he be confined or imprisoned in this state against his will or by causing someone to be sent out of this state against his will is guilty of kidnapping. There are three elements to this crime that all must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • That the defendant lacked the authority to commit this act;
  • That the defendant forcible seized and confined another person;
  • That the act was done to cause the person to be confined in this state or to cause him to be sent out of this state against his will or to be held to service against his will.

If convicted of the crime of kidnapping in Massachusetts you face a possible 10 year state prison sentence or, if the case is prosecuted in the District Courts you can be sentence for up to 2 years in jail. If the victim is under the age of 16 the punishment increases to a maximum 15 year state prison sentence.

Kidnapping with the Intent to Extort Money

This is another form of kidnapping in Massachusetts made criminal by the same statute. The added element involves the intent to get money from someone or hold someone for ransom. This form of kidnapping is punishable by up to life in prison and is prosecuted only in the Superior Courts.

Aggravated Kidnapping

The same Massachusetts statute, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265 Section 26, provides that anyone who commits the crime of kidnapping while being armed with a firearm must serve a 10 year sentence if prosecuted in the Superior Courts. If the case is prosecuted in the District Courts there is a mandatory 2½ year sentence that must be imposed. If a firearm is used during a kidnapping with the intent to extort money there is a mandatory 20 year sentence that must be imposed. If the kidnapping is committed by someone armed with a dangerous weapon and serious bodily injury is inflicted or if the victim is sexually assaulted there is a mandatory 25 year state prison sentence that will be imposed.

Case Results » Kidnapping
  • Charges of Rape and Kidnapping Dismissed Prior to Arraignment

    The defendant is a medical doctor who is married with several children. He lives outside of Massachusetts. Over the summer he was in Massachusetts attending a convention. It was the only time he had been in this state. Weeks later he received a call from a detective asking him questions about his activities in Massachusetts at the time of the convention. The detective's tone was accusatory, demeaning and vague. The doctor did the right thing in this case and refused to speak with the detective, instead contacting our office for advice. Attorney Neyman was hired. Our discussions with the police detective disclosed that a woman had claimed that the weekend of the convention she met our client at a reception. She claimed that she went to his room in the hotel and while in the room he would not let her leave. The woman further complained that while in the room our client coerced the woman into performing oral sex on him. Our client subsequently received a summons charging him with rape, G.L. c. 265 Section 22 and kidnapping, G.L. c. 265 Section 26. Our client denied all allegations. We hired an investigator. Through security videos, witness interviews and receipts we were able to show that our client had absolutely no contact with this woman. Consequently, this information was presented to the appropriate authorities and all charges were withdrawn prior to arraignment. 

    Read More in Sex Crimes

  • Charges of Larceny and Kidnapping Dismissed

    In February of 2017 a woman contacted a friend asking for a ride home from a shopping center. The friend arrived in a car being driven by her boyfriend, the defendant. The victim alleged that she was locked in the car and taken to a remote location where the defendant and the friend demanded money and property from the woman. The two succeeded in obtaining the property and the victim escaped. She reported the incident to the police and after identifying the defendant in a photo array an arrest was made. Among other things, the defendant was charged with larceny, G.L. c. 266 Section 30 and Kidnapping, G.L. c. 265 Section 26. Today, Attorney Stephen Neyman was able to get all charged dismissed.

    Read More in Kidnapping

  • Kidnapping Charges Dismissed

    The defendant was charged with kidnapping and some drug charges stemming from an alleged robbery said to have taken place in the winter. The victim alleged that the defendant and another kidnapped her at knifepoint and robbed her of items recently purchased at a local store. They supposedly also stole her prescription drugs. Drug charges and kidnapping charges, G.L. c. 265 Section 26 issued. Today at the pretrial hearing Attorney Neyman was able to get the kidnapping charge dismissed.

    Read More in Drug Crimes

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case." A.C. Boston, Massachusetts
★★★★★
"I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career." Melissa C. Cold Spring, New York, October 2013
★★★★★
"My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job." Bart L. S.
★★★★★
"The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life." Jacquille D. Brockton, Massachusetts
★★★★★
"In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record." Paul W. Boston, Massachusetts