False Report to a Police Officer

Making a false report to a police officer is a crime under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 269 Section 13A. The prosecutor must prove each of the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt to convict a defendant of this offense:

  1. The defendant made or caused to be made a report of a crime to a police officer.
  2. That report was false.
  3. The defendant intentionally made the false report to the police officer. This means that the report was not made through inadvertence, accident or negligence.
  4. The defendant knowingly made the false report to the police officer. This means that the defendant knew that the report was false.

Making a false report to a police officer is punishable by a fine of up to $500 or by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for up to one year, or both.

If you are charged with either of these offenses or any other crime, you should immediately contact an experienced defense attorney like Stephen Neyman. Stephen Neyman has the expertise and talent to successfully defend your charge. Call the Law Offices of Stephen Neyman at 617-263-6800 or contact us online today.

Not until 2011 was there much case law on this statute. The charge was usually brought in connection with much more serious criminal charges or disposed of in a manner where the defendant would have very little if any exposure. That changed a couple of years ago in the case of Commonwealth v. Fortuna, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 45 (2011). In Fortuna the defendant, after being shot, was interviewed by the police. Believing that he had lied to them about the incident charges were brought. After a jury trial Fortuna was convicted. On appeal he argued that the charges never should have issued because the police initiated discussions with him. In other words, the defendant did not make a false report, rather after being solicited he told them a lie. The Massachusetts Appeals Court disagreed with this approach and held that it is the substance of what is said to the police, not who initiates the discussion that serves as the basis for the charge under the statute.

Similar to this law is the Massachusetts statute addressing obstruction of justice, G.L. c. 268 Section 13B. Prosecutions under both laws are being initiated with greater frequency these days. The purpose of these prosecutions is to deter interference with police investigations, particularly in crimes involving gun violence. These laws parallel federal statutes making it a crime to lie to federal agents. These laws are under great scrutiny right now and efforts to amend or repeal these laws have been discussed in several jurisdictions. Remember, the police can lie to you. For that there is no consequence. But if you lie to them watch out. You may get charged with a crime.

So what should you do if the police start questioning you? Unless you have a lawyer with you say nothing. Your silence cannot be used to charge you with a crime...but your words can.

Client Reviews
We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case
★★★★★
I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career.
★★★★★
Melissa C. Cold Spring, New York, October 2013
My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job.
★★★★★
Bart L. S.
The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life.
★★★★★
Jacquille D. Brockton, Massachusetts
In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record
★★★★★
Paul W. Boston, Massachusetts