Justia Lawyer Rating
Super Lawyers Badge
Avvo Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association

Pre-Trial Probation

Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 276 Section 87, the trial court may place a person on pre-trial probation. Pre-trial probation is a court-approved agreement or contract between the prosecutor and defendant before a trial or a plea of guilty. Under such an agreement, a defendant is placed on probation, in the care of a probation officer, for a certain period of time and under certain conditions before he is convicted of any crime. Probation may be supervised or unsupervised. In return, the charges will be dismissed upon the defendant’s successful completion of his probation. If, on the other hand, the defendant violates any condition of his probation, then the charges will not be dismissed and the case will proceed normally.

I Violated My Pretrial Probation in Massachusetts. Can the Judge Send Me to Jail?

Absolutely not. A defendant cannot be imprisoned for violating his pre-trial probation because he has neither been convicted nor pled guilty to any crime. However, a defendant who violates pre-trial probation can be held with or without bail if the court so decides at a bail hearing.

Can the Conditions of My Pretrial Probation be Modified?

Although a pre-trial probation agreement is entered with the defendant’s consent, the court retains the authority to modify the conditions of probation as long as the change is not the equivalent of a new punishment. Probationary conditions signed by the defendant have no force without the court order, and probation derives enforceability from a court order, not from the defendant’s agreement. Common probationary conditions include participation in rehabilitative programs, performance of community service, periodic reporting to probation and seeking and retaining employment. The court may also modify the time period of probation, provided that it does so within the original probationary period or within a reasonable time after that period has ended.

All conditions of probation must be reasonably related to probationary goals in order to survive constitutional scrutiny. Probationary goals are typically rehabilitative, but they may be punitive, retributive or deterrent.

Pretrial Probation may be the Only Way to Avoid Deportation

Sometimes district attorneys offer a continuance without a finding thinking they are being generous to a defendant. Regardless of their intentions a continuance without a finding (CWOF) might result in deportation. CWOFs are considered convictions for immigration purposes. If you are not an American citizen you should ask your lawyer about this. We have been successful getting prosecutors to agree to pretrial probation in cases where our clients face deportation. Non-citizens charged with minor drug offenses represent a large contingent of people we represent with this problem. We get our clients pretrial probation when necessary.

Pre-trial probation is not widely available, and usually less serious offenses are involved when it is available. It is not an option after a plea or admission. The current economic slump will continue to exacerbate the overcrowded conditions in Massachusetts prisons, and that will doubtlessly result in institutional pressure on practitioners to know the probation system inside and out. In his twenty-years of experience defending criminal charges, Stephen Neyman has gained unparalleled knowledge of probation procedures. If you have any questions regarding pre-trial probation or other criminal matters, call the Law Offices of Stephen Neyman, P.C. at 617-263-6800 or contact us online today. Si usted habla español contacte a nuestro asistente legal Maria Rivera en 617-877-6270.

Case Results >> Pre-Trial Probation
  • Pretrial Probation for Pharmacist Charged With Malicious Destruction to Property Under $1,200

    Our client is a pharmacist. On January 15, 2020 he and the driver of another vehicle got into a verbal altercation over this person taking our client's parking space. Infuriated, our client returned to the location where the victim parked and slashed her car tires. Unbeknownst to him, security cameras in the area captured the entire incident. Our client left the area and was summonsed to court for malicious destruction to property under $1,200, a violation of G.L. c. 266 section 127. He never received the summons and a warrant issued. Yesterday, he was pulled over for a moving violation and the officer alerted him to the outstanding warrant. Our client called our office to represent him. We went into court to remove the default. While doing so we prevailed on the assistant district attorney to agree to pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87. The case will be dismissed once our client makes restitution in the amount of $250. 

    Read More in Pretrial Probation

  • Pretrial Probation Under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 Imposed for Man Charged With Assault and Battery on a Police Officer

    Several months ago police in a large Massachusetts city responded to a call for a man in parking in someone's driveway, unlawfully and arguing with the individual. The officer investigating was told by the alleged caller that things were fine now and it was okay to leave the area. The officer did not leave. Instead, he inquired of neighbors and others in the area about the nature of the dispute. He determined that our client had become physical with the 911 caller. The "victim" denied any physical assault. The officer then confronted our client and aggressively interrogated him. Feeling intimidated, our client allegedly pushed the office away telling him "get out of my face". Our client was then arrested and charged with assault and battery on a police officer in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13D. He hired Attorney Stephen Neyman to represent him. Today, we were able to get pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87 for our client. All charges will be dismissed after the production of a letter of apology to the police officer. 

    This case was determined telephonically due to the courts being closed

    Read More in G.L. c. 265 Section 13D

  • Pretrial Probation Under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 For Man Charged With Resisting Arrest and Assault and Battery on a Police Officer

    On June 2, 2019 members of a Massachusetts police department were monitoring a rally involving hundreds of people. Various factions of people at the rally became aggressive towards one another and violence erupted. The police attempted to keep the situation peaceful without success. Several fights broke out and the police intervened. During the course of this incident officers alleged that our client struck police officers and resisted their efforts to arrest him. Our client was charged with assault and battery on a police officer, G.L. c. 265 Section 13D, disturbing a public assembly, G.L. c. 272 Section 40 and resisting arrest G.L. c. 268 Section 32B. Attorney Neyman was retained and was able to get the accused pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 Section 87. He will have no record. 

    Read More in Resisting Arrest

Client Reviews
"We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case." A.C. Boston, Massachusetts
"I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career." Melissa C. Cold Spring, New York, October 2013
"My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job." Bart L. S.
"The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life." Jacquille D. Brockton, Massachusetts
"In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record." Paul W. Boston, Massachusetts