Case Results » Bail Hearings

Our client was indicted on charges of home invasion G.L. c. 265 section 18C and several other violent crimes. He was detained under the dangerousness statute when charged with these crimes in the district court. We got him out on a 58A appeal to the superior court. When he was indicted the district attorney's office again moved for detention under 58A. We convinced the judge not to order detention. The man was released on conditions.  

Read More in Bail 

The defendant is charged with armed home invasion pursuant to G.L. c. 265 section 18C, possession of a firearm G.L. c. 269 section 10(a), carrying a loaded firearm G.L. c. 269 section 10(n), possession of a high capacity handgun G.L. c. 269 section 10(m) and several other violent crimes. Prior to our office getting retained he was held under the Massachusetts Dangerousness statute, G.L. c. 276 section 58A. We appealed that decision to the Superior Court earlier today. The judge agreed with us that our client should be released from custody. He is now home with his family. 

Read More in Violent Crimes

The defendant is nineteen years old. On August 22, 2022 he was driving a family member's car. He had several passengers in the car. The police pulled him over for allegedly running through a stop sign. The officer claimed that all of the occupants got out of the vehicle without being asked. One of the officers reported that our client, the driver, permitted him to search the car. The same officer reported that while searching, he observed a firearm in plain view on the floor of the passenger side of the vehicle. Our client and the others were arrested and charged with violating G.L. c. 269 section 10(a), unlawful possession of a firearm. A conviction for this carries a mandatory eighteen month jail sentence. Represented by another lawyer, the defendant was detained under G.L. c. 276 section 58A, the Massachusetts "dangerousness" law. We were subsequently hired. Our investigation produced a videotape of the officer violating our clients rights by conducting a full, non consensual search of the vehicle and finding the gun tucked under the passenger seat, not in plain view. With this information, we convinced the judge to release our client. 

Read More in Gun Cases

Our client lives in Florida. A few weeks ago he was charged with trafficking over 200 grams of cocaine in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 32E. He is facing a mandatory 12 year state prison sentence. Before we were hired to represent him bail was set at $100,000.00 with a condition that he wear a GPS and remain in Massachusetts were he to be released. Attorney Neyman was able to get the bail reduced to $5,000.00 and eliminated the GPS and Massachusetts residency requirements. The man is free to live in Florida while the case is pending. 

Read More in Cocaine Trafficking Defense Lawyers

Prior to our involvement in this case our client was detained under the dangerousness law pursuant to G.L. c. 276 section 58A. He is charged with home invasion under G.L. c. 265 section 18C and multiple firearms offenses, one of which is under G.L. c. 269 section 10(a). We appealed the order of detention earlier today and secured the release of our client. 

Read More in Bail 

Our client is a law enforcement officer charged with indecent assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13H. It is alleged that he had nonconsensual sexual contact with family member several years ago. He was arrested and a bail was set. He posted the bail and appeared for his arraignment. At the arraignment hearing the district attorney's office asked for an increased bail citing a flight risk. We succeeded in getting that request denied. We also had the judge vacate the bail order and let our client out on personal recognizance. 

Read More in Bail

Our client is out on bail with strict conditions of release. On several occasions he has asked us to move the Court to modify his conditions of release to have his GPS removed so that he can attend events that prohibit him from entering with the device. Bail in Massachusetts is governed by G.L. c. 276 section 58 and in some cases G.L. c. section 58A. The latter statute permits a judge to set conditions including home confinement, GPS monitoring, cash bail and other measures. In this case, the judge and the prosecutor have agreed with our motions to modify the conditions of release on several occasions to accommodate employment, medical issues and economic matters. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant is charged with two counts of aggravated rape under G.L. c. 265 section 22 and possession of a firearm, G.L. c. 269 section 10(a), possession of a large capacity firearm under G.L. c. 269 section 10(m) and assault with the intent to rob under G.L. c. 265 section 18b. While out on conditions of release he picked up another case involving a gun and extreme violence. He was revoked on that case and ultimately released with a GPS and home confinement. We had those conditions modified to eliminate home confinement. 

Read More in Bail

Our client is charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. He and his girlfriend of many years have endured a volatile relationship in recent months culminating in several 209A restraining orders and domestic assault and battery cases. This incident arose after the complainant had been drinking. She accused our client of infidelity. Trying to diffuse the situation he left her home. This angered her and she called 911, making unfounded accusations of violence. The district attorney's office moved for detention under G.L. c. 276 section 58A. We convinced the judge to hear the argument on that today. The judge agreed that detention was not appropriate and our client was released. 

Read More in Bail 

Our client is charged with motor vehicle homicide under G.L. c. 90 section 24G. After her arrest an investigation revealed that she had attempted to flee to an island where she has significant family support. Consequently, the woman was ordered to home confinement with a GPS monitoring device. Subsequently our office was retained to represent her. Today, we were able to have the judge remove the GPS requirement entirely. 

Read More in Motor Vehicle Crimes

The defendant is charged with aggravated rape of a child under G.L. c. 265 section 23A and indecent assault and battery in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13B. He was initially ordered to home confinement with a GPS monitoring device. Due to many discovery delays we were able to go into court and eliminate the home confinement aspect of his bail conditions. 

Read More in Sex Crimes

Our client has cases pending in two courts, one for violation of a harassment prevention order under G.L. c. 258E and the other for assault by means of a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 265 section 15B. He has been in violation of his conditions of release on several occasions. Most of these are due to issues with his GPS. Consequently, over the objection of the district attorney's office we moved to have the GPS removed. The judge allowed our motion. 

Read More in Bail 

Our client is out on bail for a motor vehicle homicide case scheduled to be tried at the end of the year. She is on a GPS monitoring device with a curfew. On several occasions the GPS has not been sufficiently charged. This time, it was out for a three hour period. As a result the probation department issued a bail revocation notice and asked that she be detained. We fought the revocation attempt successfully. The defendant remains on the same conditions. 

Read More in Motor Vehicle Homicide

Our client is facing 12 years for trafficking cocaine in excess of 200 grams under G.L. c. 94C section 32 section 32E. He violated his conditions of release was was revoked under G.L. c. 276 section 58 for 90 days. We advanced this case and secured our client's release based on nuances in the bail revocation statute that convinced the judge that our client did not belong in jail 

Read More in Bail

Our client is a Green Card holder who just started his own construction business in Massachusetts. On July 11, 2021 he was observed on the side of a highway arguing with a woman who was in fact his wife. The witness saw the man then grab the woman by the throat and start to strangle her. The police were called. They interviewed the woman, her father and sister both of whom were in the vicinity and witnessed the incident. Based on their reports our client was arrested and charged with domestic assault and battery and strangulation under G.L. c. 265 section 13M and G.L. c. 265 section 15D respectively. The defendant was held on dangerousness at his arraignment under G.L. c. 275 section 58A. He then hired our office to represent him. Today, we succeeded in getting his conditions modified and getting him released. 

Read More in Bail Hearing

Our client is out on bail for a motor vehicle homicide case scheduled to be tried at the end of the year. She is on a GPS monitoring device with a curfew. On several occasions the GPS has not been sufficiently charged. This time, it was out for a three hour period. As a result the probation department issued a bail revocation notice and asked that she be detained. We fought the revocation attempt successfully. The defendant remains on the same conditions. 

Read More in Motor Vehicle Homicide

The defendant is charged with a multitude of sex crimes the most serious of which is rape of a child by force under G.L. c. 265 section 22A. A condition of his release was home confinement. Recently his circumstances suggested a modification of this condition of release. Over the objection of the prosecution we filed a motion to modify this condition. The judge who originally ordered home confinement heard our case and agreed to remove this condition. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant is out on bail for a major sex crime for which he is facing a mandatory ten years in prison. At his arraignment he was given a curfew, a GPS with an exclusion zone and travel restrictions. The restrictions were weighing heavily on the defendant and he asked our office to move for a modification of his conditions of release. The judge allowed the motion and many of the restrictions were removed.

Read More in Bail

Our client was recently charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M. He was ordered to stay away from and not contact the victim, his girlfriend of over a year. Our office did not represent him at his arraignment. A day later, the man hired Attorney Stephen Neyman to represent him. The first thing our office did was file a motion to vacate the stay away and no contact order. The motion was immediately scheduled for a hearing and allowed. There are no more pretrial restrictions on our client.

Read More in Bail 

Our client is a software engineer with a pending domestic assault and battery case, G.L. c. 265 section 13M and a collateral restraining order G.L. c 209A. The complaining witness recently learned that our client intended to leave the jurisdiction to visit with a sick family member. Feeling like she had lost her control over our client the complaining witness called the police to report a violation of the restraining order. The defendant was arrested. We appeared in court immediately and after a contentious bail hearing the judge agreed to release our client. Given that the restraining order has no travel restrictions we were able to convince the district attorney's office not to charge the defendant with the 209A order violation. 

Read More in Bail Hearings

A few weeks ago our client was in an accident on an interstate highway in Bristol County. He was driving a car occupied by his friend, front seat passenger and girlfriend, rear seat driver's side passenger. When the police arrived at the scene they immediately called EMS. All occupants were medevaced to a Boston hospital. Pursuant to an inventory policy the police towed the vehicle and searched a backpack in the rear passenger seat. In it they found a firearm. All occupants were charged with various gun charges. The district attorney's office moved for detention under the Massachusetts Dangerousness Law, G.L. c. 276 58A. Attorney Neyman was hired and after a protracted bail argument the judge agreed not to hold the defendant under that statute and he was released. 

Read More in Gun Possession

In July of 2020 the defendant was arrested and charged with multiple counts of open and gross lewdness under G.L. c. 272 section 16. He was placed on conditions of pretrial release that included refraining from the use of alcohol, a trigger for his alleged unlawful behavior. A SCRAMM device was required. In October the defendant was found in violation of his conditions of release when he became severely intoxicated. He was revoked pursuant to G.L. c. 276 section 58B and given the statutory 90 day jail sentence. Attorney Neyman filed a motion under Commonwealth v. Lougee requesting reinstatement of bail and conditions of release. The judge agreed with our request and allowed the motion. The defendant was released from custody. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant is facing serious gun charges in the superior court. He was charged with carrying a firearm without a license to carry under G.L. c. 269 section 10(a), carrying a loaded firearm under G.L. c. 269 10(n)  and eight additional counts including several serious drug charges. He was initially detained under G.L. c. 276 section 58A until he engaged our office to represent him. We have successfully modified his conditions of release several times, most recently to permit him to work out of state and partially eliminate his curfew. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant is charged in the Superior Court with possession with intent to distribute drugs, second and subsequent offense under G.L. c. 94C section 32 C. He faces mandatory state prison time if convicted. A few days ago he was rearrested for another drug related offense and his bail was revoked. Our office was hired to represent the man on a new case and the bail revocation was overturned. The defendant is back at home and working. 

Read More in Bail 

The defendant is facing multiple OUI cases in Massachusetts. He was placed on pretrial conditions that required SCRAM testing. The times of the required test interfered with his work hours and it was necessary to file a motion to modify the conditions of release. Our office did just that and the judge agreed to amend the SCRAM testing requirements to avoid any interruption in the defendant's work schedule. 

Read More in OUI 

The defendant is charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. He was placed on conditions of release that included submitting to the SCRAM device test several times per day. A few weeks ago the SCRAM registered a positive result after one of the tests and the assistant district attorney requested that the defendant's bail be revoked and that he serve 90 days pending trial under the bail revocation portion of the bail statute. The judge denied that request and agreed to a hearing on the modification of the conditions of release. After a hearing the judge removed the SCRAM requirement. The defendant will no longer have to submit to alcohol screens while waiting for his case to be resolved. 

Read More in Bail

Several months ago the defendant was charged with various crimes and a harassment prevention order was placed on him. Among his conditions of release was GPS monitoring, exclusion zones, stay away from complaining witness and more. The defendant was accused of violating those conditions and his bail was revoked. He then retained our office to represent him. We succeeded in getting him released from jail. Subsequently, he was again accused of violating his conditions of release. A judge revoked him and the man was again ordered back to jail. We investigated the allegations of his violation and were able to learn that he had not in fact violated his conditions. The judge who revoked him agreed to hear our motion to reconsider. Today, our client was released with the same conditions previously ordered. 

This case was determined telephonically due to the courts being closed

Read More in Bail

The defendant is out on bail facing drug trafficking charges under G.L. c. 94C section 32E. He is looking at a mandatory minimum three year sentence. In the past, on other cases the individual defaulted and missed his court appearance. He has a significant criminal history. He was permitted release but on strict conditions that required GPS monitoring. He hired Attorney Stephen Neyman to represent him. Today, we successfully moved the judge for the removal of the GPS device. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant was arrested for armed robbery and arraigned in an urban district court in Massachusetts. The police report stated that witnesses observed the defendant, armed and robbing a store and people in the store. The defendant was charged with, among other things, armed robbery under G.L. c. 265 Section 17. The defendant has a criminal record and has served state prison time in the past. The district attorney moved for detention under the Massachusetts Dangerousness Law, G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. He was detained by a judge in the district court. Attorney Neyman was hired to appeal the order of detention. We scheduled a hearing on the appeal in less than one week. Our investigators were able to provide reliable information that the eyewitness accounts were biased and that their identification of our client was based on unlawful and suggestive police identification procedures. The Superior Court judge agreed with our position and released our client. 

Read More in Armed Robbery 

The defendant is charged with illegal possession of several firearms. Some of the indictments mandate state prison time if the defendant is convicted. At his arraignment he was found dangerous under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the defendant. As a result of a change in circumstances over the course of several weeks Attorney Neyman was able to convince the assistant district attorney and judge to vacate the 58A dangerousness finding. The defendant is now eligible for release. 

Read More in Bail

Our client was charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 265 Section 15A. The prosecution moved for detention under the Massachusetts "dangerousness" statute, G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. After being detained he hired Attorney Neyman to represent him. We immediately filed for a hearing in the Superior Court. The judge in that court agreed that detention was not necessary and the detention order was vacated and the client was released. 

Read More in Bail

A few days ago at approximately 2:45 a.m. the police received a call from a man complaining that he had just been assaulted and stabbed by his wife. The officers arrived at the home and found the man bleeding from the hand and arm consistent with the man's representations and defensive wounds. The wife was located on the premises, arrested and charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 265 Section 15A. The prosecution moved for detention under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A (dangerousness). Attorney Neyman was able to get the woman personal recognizance. 

Read More in Bail

The defendant was charged with trafficking heroin under G.L. c. 94C Section 32E. He was held on $150,000 bail in the district court after arraignment. As a result the defendant retained our office to represent him on the case. We appealed his bail to the superior court. The bail was significantly reduced and the defendant was released.

Read More in Drug Trafficking

Several months ago the defendant was charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M. Our office resolved the matter by way of pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 for a period of three months. Within a few weeks the defendant violated and his case was placed back on the trial list. Additionally, the man's bail was revoked so a speedy trial was scheduled. He again retained our services. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get the case dismissed.

Read More in Bail

The defendant is released from custody on G.L. c. 276 58A dangerousness conditions. The district court judge imposed a condition of home detention. We appealed that condition to the superior court judge and succeeded in getting home detention eliminated. The defendant has no restrictions and no exclusions zones.

Read More in Bail

This case has been ongoing for about four months. The defendant was charged with motor vehicle homicide at the end of 2018. Her bail was set at $25,000 after police learned that she was at the registry attempting to obtain identification to flee the country. The Superior Court judge reduced the bail in half after a bail appeal. The defendant was still unable to post bail. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get the bail reduced to $2,500. The woman was released from custody today.

Read More in Bail Appeals

The defendant was charged with fentanyl trafficking over ten grams under G.L. c. 94C Section 32E. She is facing a 3 ½ year mandatory state prison sentence. Child endangerment charges were also filed due to the fact that the woman's one year old child accidentally accessed a pill and swallowed it requiring emergency medical attention. When the police searched the home they found high capacity feeding devices resulting in additional charges. The district moved for detention under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. The family hired Attorney Stephen Neyman for the case and to get the woman released from custody. Today, after a dangerousness hearing the woman was released on conditions.

Read More in Drug Trafficking

The defendant was charged with indecent assault and battery stemming from an incident with his co-worker. Prior to our office entering an appearance on this case the defendant was ordered to stay away from the alleged victim and her place of employment. The two worked at the same establishment. This effectively put our client out of work. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the defendant. Today, we went into court and had the conditions of release modified to permit our client to return to work.

Read More in Indecent Assault and Battery

The defendant is charged with rape under G.L. c. 265 Section 22. He was originally held on dangerousness under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. Attorney Neyman was able to negotiate his release to home detention with conditions that  he wear a GPS monitoring device with exclusion zones. The case was scheduled for probable cause hearing on two occasions. The district attorney's office failed to indict within a reasonable time period. Today, Attorney Neyman successfully moved the court to lift the home detention condition.

Read More in Rape Defense

The defendant is charged with motor vehicle homicide under G.L. c. 90 Section 24. Prior to the case being charged the defendant was accused of making statements suggesting that she intended to flee to Puerto Rico where she has relatives and friends. She was quickly apprehended, charged and had a very high bail set in the district court. Attorney Stephen Neyman was retained to represent her for a bail appeal. Our office was able to get the bail reduced that has enabled her release.

Read More in Motor Vehicle Homicide

The defendant is charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M. A condition of his release was a stay away and no contact order from complaining witness. The defendant and the complaining witness have a child together. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the defendant. The first order of business was to go into court immediately and get the conditions of release modified. Today our office succeeded in getting that done. The defendant is now permitted contact with the alleged victim.

Read More in Bail Hearings

Our client has been charged with aggravated rape, G.L. c. 265 Section 22 and possession of a firearm, G.L. c. 269 Section 10(a) in the Superior Court. Several months ago we succeeded in getting him release notwithstanding the prosecution's attempts for detention under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. Our investigation disclosed several flaws in the prosecution's case that clearly question the integrity of the complaining witness' report to the police and grand jury testimony. Armed with this information we moved the court to modify the conditions of release to permit our client to attend school and work.

Read More in Gun Cases

The defendant has been charged with rape. The case is currently pending in the district court waiting for indictment and prosecution in the superior court. Last week, the prosecution moved for detention on dangerousness grounds pursuant to G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. Their request was granted. The defendant's family contacted and retained Attorney Stephen Neyman to represent the man. Today, we went into court and secured the release of our client.

Read More in Rape

The defendant is facing serious indecent assault and battery charges in violation of G.L. c. 265 Section 13H. The case is over one year old. Attorney Neyman was retained just last week. One of the conditions of release was that the defendant submit to random urine and drug screens. This requirement was interfering with the defendant's employment and he was at risk for losing his job. Our office advanced the case and moved the judge to modify the conditions of release to eliminate the random urine screen requirements. The district attorney opposed our motion. The judge allowed our request and the defendant no longer has to submit to the random screens.

Read More in Sex Crimes

Several months ago our office was retained to represent a man charged with indecent assault and battery on a person 14 or older under G.L. c. 265 Section 13H. The man had already been arraigned and found dangerous under the dangerousness statute, G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. One of the conditions of his release was to stay and not to contact the victim's mother who was also the mother of the defendant's toddler. The mother contacted the district attorney's office on several occasions asking that the no contact condition be vacated. The district attorney's office ignored the request multiple times. Once we learned of this fact we went into court with a motion to vacate the no contact order and have conditions of 58A modified. The judge heard our request and allowed the motion.

Read More in Sex Crimes

Over the weekend, Lexington, Massachusetts police were called for a domestic assault. They were called by the victim, the defendant's wife. The victim reported that following an argument she was struck by the defendant. She had bruising consistent with her complaints. She further stated that the defendant had kicked her in the thigh and in the side of the head. While the victim called 911 the defendant took the phone from her. The defendant was arrested and charged with assault and battery on a family household member (domestic) under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M and intimidation of a witness in violation of G.L. c. 268 Section 13B. Attorney Neyman was hired and was able to maintain personal recognizance. The no contact and stay away orders issued by the arresting officers were vacated by the judge as well.

Read More in Bail Hearings

The defendant is a young man in his early twenties. Over the weekend he was arrested and charged with domestic assault and battery in violation of G.L. c. 265 Section 13M and strangulation under G.L. c. 265 Section 15D. The bail commissioner over the weekend refused to release him to an order of bail. He hired Attorney Stephen Neyman. Today, our office was able to get the man released on personal recognizance.

Read More in Bail Hearings

The defendant is facing a mandatory twelve years in state prison on a pending drug trafficking charge. Several months ago we secured his release on bail with a condition that he wear a GPS tracking device. The other night the man forgot to charge the device. The police department and probation department tried to call him several times to no avail. An arrest warrant issued and the defendant was arrested and brought back into court. Attorney Neyman was able to convince the assistant district attorney and the judge to reimpose the original conditions of release.

Read More in Drug Trafficking

Over the weekend the defendant and his girlfriend were out celebrating St. Patrick's Day at a local bar. The girlfriend became jealous as several women showed interest in the defendant. The two argued. The argument escalated when the two went back to their apartment. The dispute became violent and the police were called to the home. The victim claimed that the defendant beat her and kicked her. She was taken to the hospital where it was discovered that she had a broken rib and punctured lung. Our client was arrested and charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M. After a bail hearing our office was able to get the defendant released on personal recognizance.

Read more in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant is not a citizen of the United States. He lives on the west coast and is working towards his Masters degree at a prestigious university. Over the weekend he was arrested after his former girlfriend called the police complaining that he had raped and beaten her after she broke up with him and refused to have sex with him. The prosecution had pictures taken at the hospital corroborating the woman's complaint. The family hired Attorney Neyman yesterday. Mr. Neyman was able to get bail set in the amount of $1,000 (one thousand dollars). See bail statute, G.L. c. 276 Section 58. No conditions other than to stay away from the victim and surrender a passport were placed on the defendant. He posted bail and returned to the state where he resides.

Read More in Rape

In yesterday's case result we posted about our client being released on personal recognizance for a drug case. He is on probation in the Middlesex Superior Court for a stabbing conviction in 2014. The defendant was detained on a probation warrant until he could be brought into court today. Attorney Neyman was able to get the man a reasonable bail which he immediately posted.

Read More in Bail Hearings

The defendant is charged with domestic assault and battery, G.L. 265 Section 13M. The defendant was ordered as a condition of his release not to have contact with the victim and to stay away from her. While waiting for the pretrial to be called the prosecutor saw the defendant in the vicinity of the victim. As a result the prosecutor moved to revoke the defendant's bail, telling the judge that she and the victim witness advocate had just witnessed the violation. Attorney Neyman objected to the motion and convinced the judge not to revoke the bail. The defendant remains free.

Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant has a cocaine trafficking case pending in the Suffolk Superior Court that involves multiple kilograms of cocaine. Prior to our office becoming involved in the case a high, unaffordable bail was set by a District Court judge. Attorney Neyman was retained for the case and started the defense process. Today, before a Superior Court judge in a bail appeal he was able to get the bail reduced by half, an amount that the defendant can afford. The defendant's family will be posting the bail for his release.

Read More in Drug Trafficking

Last weekend the police effectuated a stop of a car driving in Auburn, Massachusetts. Officers stated in their report that the defendant's license plate was not illuminated. After the stop officers observed ammunition on the floor of the vehicle and ordered the defendant to get out of the vehicle. He complied. Upon doing so officers saw a handgun in the car. The defendant was arrested and charged with carrying a firearm, G.L. c. 269 Section 10 and unlawful possession of ammunition, G.L. c. 269 Section 10. At arraignment the district attorney moved for detention pursuant to G.L. c. 276 Section 58A, the dangerousness provision of the Massachusetts bail statute. Our office was subsequently retained. Today, after a hearing our client was released.

Read More in Bail Hearings

On February 8, 2017 a woman arranged to have a friend pick her up near downtown crossing in Boston, Massachusetts. The friend arrived with a man, the defendant who was driving a Honda. The woman entered the defendant's car with the understanding that she would be given a ride home. Instead, the woman was assaulted with a knife and robbed of money, clothing and prescription drugs. The man was later arrested and charged with kidnapping, armed robbery, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, possession with intent to distribute drugs and more. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the man. Today, after a lengthy bail hearing the defendant was released on his own recognizance. In addition, Attorney Neyman was able to get the drug charges dismissed prior to arraignment.

Read More in Assault and Battery Dangerous Weapon

The defendant is one of our clients charged with domestic assault and battery. He was placed on conditions of pretrial release that included wearing a GPS monitoring device, abstaining from the use of alcohol, alcohol screens, mandatory reporting and more. The defendant missed his screens on February 1st and February 3rd, failed to report to probation and refused to charge his GPS monitoring device. A probation warrant issued and the defendant was returned to court for a bail revocation hearing. The prosecutor asked for a revocation of bail which would require the defendant to remain in custody. Attorney Neyman convinced the judge not to revoke bail and to modify the release conditions in a more favorable manner.

Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant, a local software engineer was surprised by police over the weekend when he was confronted and arrested for allegedly hitting a family member. The accused had been involved in a similar incident less than six months earlier in the same county. He was arraigned today and the district attorney's office sought an order of bail. Attorney Stephen Neyman appeared on behalf of the man and was able to have him released on his personal recognizance.

Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant is a forty-nine year old salesman charged with domestic assault and battery, malicious destruction to property, resisting arrest, unlawful firearm possession and more. In mid-December the police responded to a 911 call for a domestic situation growing out of control. The officers arrived to find the husband in a manic state, violent and irrational. The police tazed the man and arrested him. In court the next day the district attorney moved for detention under the dangerousness statute, G.L. c. 276 Section 58A. A dangerousness hearing was scheduled and the family hired Attorney Stephen Neyman. Today, after the hearing the accused was released.

Read More in Resisting Arrest

The defendant is a local businessman who, after a one and a half year investigation was indicted for allegedly stealing nearly twenty million dollars from the state. At the time of arraignment the defense was given nearly two thousand pages of grand jury minutes detailing how the alleged theft came about. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the accused at the inception of this investigation. Today, at the arraignment and bail hearing our client was released on personal recognizance.

Read More in Theft Crimes

The defendant was charged with trafficking cocaine in violation of G.L. c. 94C Section 32E. He is facing a mandatory minimum eight year prison sentence. The prosecution alleged that police were alerted by a confidential informant to the possibility of a large scale cocaine trafficking case in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The police followed up on the lead. Their information was corroborated when the defendant and his accomplice entered a gas station parking lot, the purported location for the deal. The defendant entered an adjacent store. The officers, acting in an undercover capacity approached the car and saw the passenger holding a large quantity of cocaine. Both parties were arrested and arraigned. Bail was set. Afterwards, one of the defendants hired our office to get the bail reduced. Today, Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting the bail significantly reduced.

Read More in Cocaine Trafficking Defense

The defendant has been charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and domestic assault and battery following a fight in which his girlfriend's former partner was stabbed. Initially G.L. c. 276 Section 58A conditions were set keeping the defendant away from his girlfriend. He was also required to were a GPS tracking device. Today, the man retained our office for his case. Our first order of business was to get his bail conditions modified. We succeeded in doing so by getting the stay away lifted and the GPS removed.

Read More in Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon

The defendant has been charged with human trafficking (G.L. c. 265 Section 50); possession of illicit material depicting a child in the nude (G.L. c. 272 Section 29) and photographing a child in the nude unsuspectingly (G.L. c. 272 Section 105). Bail was set in the district court and successfully appealed to the superior court by our office last summer. The defendant was recently indicted on these charges and arraigned in the superior court. The assistant district attorney tried to get the bail increased substantially. Attorney Neyman contested the request and won. No additional bail was set.

Read More in Possession of Illicit Material Involving Minors

The defendant is a thirty year old man accused of domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 Section 13M. The prosecution alleged that over the weekend, the defendant and his girlfriend got into a verbal argument. The dispute escalated and ultimately the defendant grabbed the woman by the throat and tried to strangle her. Her roommate called the police who arrived, conducted an investigation and arrested the defendant. The defendant immediately contacted and hired Attorney Stephen Neyman. At the arraignment the assistant district attorney asked for bail. Attorney Neyman opposed the request. The judge agreed with our office and released the defendant on his personal recognizance.

Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant is in his sixties and charged with photographing an unsuspecting person in the nude. He lives out of state. Before our office represented him he was arraigned and conditions of bail were set that prevented him from traveling out of state. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the man on the underlying case. Today, we went into court and convinced the judge to modify the terms of bail to permit out of state travel.

Read More in Photographing a Person in the Nude

Our client is a pharmacist who lived in another state over two thousand miles from Massachusetts. There, she had been investigate for a multitude of drug offenses stemming from her employment. She moved to Massachusetts and after doing so was indicted for several drug crimes in her former state. A warrant for her arrest issued. She was arrested in Peabody for being a fugitive from justice in violation of G.L. c. 276 Section 20A. The prosecution asked the judge to hold the woman without bail until the other state came to get her. This would have resulted in her being incarcerated for months in Massachusetts. However, today our office was able to get her bail which was posted.

Read More in Drug Crimes

The defendant drives a transportation and is involved in separation proceedings with the victim, his wife. Over the weekend the victim accused the defendant of going over to her house and threatening her for previously having him arrested on domestic assault and battery charges against her. Her allegations prompted another arrest and the man was held without bail over the weekend. Today, he was brought into court and arraigned on the new charges. The district attorney tried to have his bail revoked under G.L. c. 276 Section 58. Our office appeared on behalf of the defendant and convinced the judge to release the defendant on his own recognizance.

Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

The defendant is a real estate developer who was charged in late September with breaking and entering, violation of a 209A restraining order and several firearms offenses in the Lowell District Court. The alleged restraining order violation resulted in an arrest and incarceration pending the prosecution's request for a 58A dangerousness hearing. After detention was ordered our office was hired on the underlying cases and to fight allegations at the dangerousness hearing. Today, after the 58A proceeding was heard Attorney Neyman was able to get the defendant released.

Read More in Restraining Orders

Several months ago our client was arrested and charged with drug trafficking in an amount that warrants a twelve year period of incarceration. Due to fact that he was found at the airport with a large amount of cash a substantial bail was set. Attorney Neyman was then hired to defend the man. Today, at his arraignment in the superior court, bail was significantly reduced. The man is not in custody and the case is pending.

Read More in Drug Trafficking

The defendant is a college student entering his senior at a university outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Several weeks ago he was arrested and charged with OUI. He had a history of alcohol related cases. At the arraignment the assistant district attorney asked the judge to order the defendant to submit to random alcohol screens. The order entered. Today, Attorney Stephen Neyman successfully moved to modify the bail conditions so that the defendant could in fact attend school and not have to worry about having to return to Massachusetts for random screens.

Read More in OUI

In 1997 the defendant was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. He left the jurisdiction, moved out of state and never answered to these charges. Recently he was notified of the default and open cases. Rather than risk arrest and rendition to Massachusetts the man hired Attorney Stephen Neyman to represent him in court. Today, we removed the default warrant. The man was released on personal recognizance.

Read More in Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon

The defendant is a Boston man known to local authorities for drug dealing activities. He has a fairly significant criminal record and was recently in default for his arraignment for this case, a heroin trafficking case. Attorney Neyman was hired to remove the default and represent him on the underlying charge. The prosecution alleged in part that after a routine traffic stop police officers saw packages of heroin in plain view. They inquired about the bags at which point the defendant struck the officers, sped off, got into an accident and tossed the drugs. Although he evaded immediate arrest his identity was known to the officers. Heroin trafficking charges and other felonies were filed. A warrant issued. Today, Attorney Neyman went into court with the man and after a bail hearing was able to get him released on $500 cash bail. The prosecution asked for $75,000 thousand. The man posted the bail immediately and is now released.

The defendant is an engineer who had been arrested and charged with possession of heroin, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and resisting arrest. The incident occurred on September 3, 2014. The defendant was arraigned and released on five hundred dollars bail. A pretrial conference was scheduled for October 29, 2014 and the defendant failed to appear. He was defaulted and a warrant issued for his arrest. He hired Attorney Neyman to go into court with him, remove the default and represent him on the underlying case. Today, we went into court and had the default removed. The defendant was released on personal recognizance and another pretrial hearing has been scheduled.

The defendant is a physician at a local prominent hospital. Over the weekend she and her partner had a disagreement that became physical. Boston police responded to a 911 call and in accordance with common protocol separated the two people involved and conducted their investigation by interviewing all parties and witnesses. The complainant alleged that during the dispute our client put her hands around her throat and began to strangle her. The defendant was then arrested and held in custody for a portion of the weekend. The case was arraigned and and a bail hearing was held. The assistant district attorney requested that bail be set. Attorney Neyman successfully argued for personal recognizance.

The district attorney alleged at a district court arraignment that the defendant had raped a relative back in August of 2013. The crime occurred over several weeks at varying intervals. In the winter of 2014 the police investigating the case tried to talk to the defendant. He immediately retained our office. We advised him not to speak to the police. He complied. Several weeks later he was arraigned in the district court being represented by another lawyer. A high bail was set. Attorney Neyman scheduled a bail reduction for today for the man. Bail was reduced significantly and the man has been released pending trial. The man is back to work.