COVID-19 UPDATE: WORKING FOR YOU IN THESE CHALLENGING TIMES
Justia Lawyer Rating
Super Lawyers Badge
Avvo Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association

Case Results 2021

  • Probation Violation Hearing Withdrawn and Dismissed

    The defendant is on probation for an assault and battery case under G.L. c. 265 section 13A. Our office did not represent him in that case. Subsequently, the man was charged with domestic assault and battery G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting that case dismissed last week. However, the probation officer in the court hearing the assault and battery case served our client with a probation violation notice asking that he be found in violation of probation. Our office was able to prevail upon the probation officer to withdraw the violation notice and the judge then dismissed the matter. 

    Read More in Probation Violation Hearings

  • Default Removed and Warrant Vacated on Reckless Operation Charge and Case Dismissed Prior to Arraignment

    The defendant is an aeronautical engineer. Two years ago he was driving his car erratically on a busy street. He approached a construction site and was signaled to slow down by a police officer working the construction site detail. Rather than slow down the man defiantly gave the middle finger to the police officer. He was tracked down by other officers in that department and cited for reckless operation of a motor vehicle in violation of G.L. c. 90 section 24. The defendant missed his arraignment and left the jurisdiction. A few weeks ago he came back to Massachusetts. Remembering that he was in default and that a warrant had been issued he contacted our office and retained Attorney Stephen Neyman. Today, we removed the default and had the warrant recalled. The district attorney's office agreed to dismiss all charges upon payment of court costs, prior to arraignment. The case is now dismissed. 

    Read More in Default Removals

  • Domestic Assault and Battery Charges Against Shipping Company CEO Dismissed

    On January 27, 2021 police responded to a Worcester suburb for a domestic disturbance. The victim complained to the police that her husband struck her when she was sleeping as he was bothered by her snoring. Our office was retained to defend the husband who was charged with domestic assault and battery in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Today, we succeeded in getting all charges dismissed. 

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Bail Conditions Modified to Remove Stay Away and No Contact Order

    The defendant has a pending domestic assault and battery case G.L. c. 265 section 13M along with a companion 209A restraining order. The restraining order was modified to permit contact between the defendant and the complaining witness for the purpose of child welfare and visitation. However, there remained in place a stay away and no contact order issued by the judge in the criminal case. Over objection of the prosecutor we were able to get the judge to modify the conditions to match with the modified restraining order. 

    Read More in Bail Hearings

  • Continuance Without a Finding For Man Charged With Larceny of a Motor Vehicle and Assorted Motor Vehicle Crimes

    On November 1, 2019 members of a suburban Boston police department responded to an accident scene. They immediately observed a car with extensive damage. The vehicle was running and the operator was not in the car. Bystanders told the officers that they had witnessed the incident and described the driver as a man wearing clown makeup and with particularized clothing. Within a few minutes the officers located our client. The witnesses made a positive identification of our client as the man who was driving the car. The police soon learned that the car had been stolen from outside of a restaurant in another municipality. Our client was arrested and charged with receiving a stolen motor vehicle, G.L. c. 266 section 28, leaving the scene of an accident with property damage, G.L. c. 90 section 24, OUI, G.L. c. 90 section 24, reckless operation of a motor vehicle, G.L. c. 90 section 24 and malicious destruction to property over $1,200 in violation of G.L. c. 266 section 127. Our office was retained to represent the defendant. Today, we were able to get the case continued without a finding. In one year the charges will all be dismissed. 

    Read More in Motor Vehicle Crimes

  • Pretrial Probation Under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 Terminated Early

    Several months ago our client was placed in pretrial probation under G.L. c. 267 section 87 for a drug possession case G.L. c. 94C section 34 with the condition that he get a drug dependency evaluation. The evaluation came back favorable to our client. As a result we went back into court to move to terminate probation. That effort was successful today. 

    Read More in Drug Possession

  • Domestic Assault and Battery Case Against Plastics Engineer Dismissed

    Our client is a plastics engineer with two doctorate degrees. He works for a biohazard company in Massachusetts and is their chief operating officer. On August 13, 2020 police responded to a call for a domestic assault and battery. They were met by the victim who stated that she and her husband had a verbal argument that became physical. Our client grabbed the woman by the neck pushing her head towards the floor demanding that she clean up spilled food. Our client did not deny the allegations to the police and he was arrested and charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Today, our office was able to get all charges dismissed. 

    Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery 

  • Charges of Criminal Harassment Against Electrical Contractor Do Not Issue After Clerk Magistrate Hearing

    Our client is an electrical contractor who has worked for the union on commercial jobs for over thirty years. He also works freelance for a private organization installing electrical for residential homes. The union permits him to have additional work. Recently our client and the domestic contractor got into a dispute over money. Our client was not paid for his services. He responded by writing threatening letters to the employer and the employer's wife. A criminal complaint application for criminal harassment was issued by the clerk's office and a clerk magistrate hearing was scheduled. Our client was facing criminal harassment charges under G.L. c. 265 section 43A. Our office was hired to represent the man. We were able to convince the clerk magistrate not to issue the complaint. 

    Read More in Clerk Magistrate Hearings

  • Charges of Distribution of a Class B Drug and Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class C Drug Against Pharmaceutical Executive Nolle Prossed

    On July 15, 2020, members of an urban Massachusetts drug task force entered our client's home with a search warrant not issued by a Massachusetts law enforcement agency. During the search drugs were found. Our client was charged with possession with intent to distribute a class B drug, a felony under G.L. c. 90C section 32A. He was also charged with possession with intent to distribute a class D drug in violation of G.L. c. 90C section 32C. The latter crime is a misdemeanor. We fought to get the affidavit in support of the search warrant provided. Inasmuch as the prosecution was unable to do we were able to have all charges dismissed. 

    Read More in Drug Crimes

  • Veteran's Court Diversion for Man Charged With Domestic Assault and Battery

    Our client is a veteran of the United States Army. He was recently charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 15A, a felony in Massachusetts. It was alleged that on October 17, 2020, during a fight with his wife our client threw a cell phone at his wife, hitting her in the face and requiring a hospital visit and stitched. Our client's military service made him eligible for pre-arraignment diversion under G.L. c. 276A section 10. The probation interview deemed our client a good candidate for the program. He will not be arraigned on the case. The felony charges were dropped to misdemeanor assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13A for which our client will not have a criminal record. 

    Read More in Pretrial Diversion

  • Software Engineer Arrested for 209A Violation Released After Contentious Bail Hearing

    Our client is a software engineer with a pending domestic assault and battery case, G.L. c. 265 section 13M and a collateral restraining order G.L. c 209A. The complaining witness recently learned that our client intended to leave the jurisdiction to visit with a sick family member. Feeling like she had lost her control over our client the complaining witness called the police to report a violation of the restraining order. The defendant was arrested. We appeared in court immediately and after a contentious bail hearing the judge agreed to release our client. Given that the restraining order has no travel restrictions we were able to convince the district attorney's office not to charge the defendant with the 209A order violation. 

    Read More in Bail Hearings

  • Pre-Arraignment Diversion for Woman Charges With Assault and Battery By Means of a Dangerous Weapon and Multiple Motor Vehicle Crimes

    In August of 2020 our client suffered a mental break after being misdiagnosed for a particular type of mental illness. During the manic episode she drove her car 60 miles to an airport. She was driving erratically, making illegal U turns and driving in the wrong direction on airport roads. The police attempted to stop her. In doing so the woman drove her vehicle into two police cruisers causing extensive damage. She was apprehended and taken to a mental health facility. She was ultimately charged with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 265 section 15A, negligent operation of a motor vehicle under G.L. c. 90 section 24, failing to stop for a police officer under G.L. c. 90 section 25 and operating a motor vehicle while uninsured under G.L. c. 90 section 34J. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent her. We were able to obtain copies of our client's mental health history with professional proof that her actions were caused exclusively by her mental illness. Based on this we were able to convince the district attorney's office not to have her arraigned, instead to continue with her mental health treatment and counseling as recommended by her doctors. The case was diverted and will not be prosecuted. 

    Read More in Motor Vehicle Crimes

  • Judge Releases Man From Custody Finding No Dangerousness Under G.L. c. 276 Section 58A

    A few weeks ago our client was in an accident on an interstate highway in Bristol County. He was driving a car occupied by his friend, front seat passenger and girlfriend, rear seat driver's side passenger. When the police arrived at the scene they immediately called EMS. All occupants were medevaced to a Boston hospital. Pursuant to an inventory policy the police towed the vehicle and searched a backpack in the rear passenger seat. In it they found a firearm. All occupants were charged with various gun charges. The district attorney's office moved for detention under the Massachusetts Dangerousness Law, G.L. c. 276 58A. Attorney Neyman was hired and after a protracted bail argument the judge agreed not to hold the defendant under that statute and he was released. 

    Read More in Gun Possession

  • Two Gun Charges Against Known Drug Dealer Dismissed at Arraignment

    The defendant was driving a motor vehicle in a Massachusetts city. He was stopped when the police allegedly observed him run a stop sign without stopping. The officers ordered the defendant to get out of the car without reasonable suspicion or probable cause to do so. They then searched the vehicle and located a large capacity firearm. Since the man had a prior gun conviction he was charged with violating G.L. c. 269 section 10(m) and G.L. c. 269 section 10G. Arguing the legality of the stop, search and seizure Attorney Neyman moved for a dismissal at arraignment. Unable to provide a valid and defensible reason for the police actions the district attorney agreed that the case would inevitably be dismissed. Accordingly, the judge dismissed all charges. 

    Read More in Gun Charges 

  • Domestic Assault and Battery Charges Against Hair Salon Owner do Not Issue After Clerk Magistrate Hearing

    Several weeks ago members of a suburban Boston police department responded to a call for a domestic incident. They arrived to find the defendant and her boyfriend engaged in a loud verbal argument. The two were separated and interviewed by the police. The boyfriend made statements indicating that the girlfriend had pushed and struck him several times. Independent police observations corroborated the statements. The woman received a summons for a clerk magistrate hearing. Our office represented her successfully. We convinced the clerk magistrate not to issue the G.L. c. 265 section 13M complaint. 

    Read More in Clerk Magistrate Hearings

  • Domestic Assault and Battery Charges Against Software Company CEO Dismissed

    In November of 2020 members of a suburban police department were dispatched to a domestic disturbance in progress. The officers who responded heard screaming and immediately entered the home. They were met by the man's wife who detailed the issues. Apparently her husband, the defendant had been out golfing and drinking. He was supposed to pick up their teenage daughter. When he arrived at the home she was visiting his daughter's friends parents noticed that our client was highly intoxicated. They responded by driving our client and his daughter home. Upon learning this the wife became outraged and an argument ensued. During the argument our client, a software company CEO pushed his wife. The daughter witnessed this and called the police. Charges of domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M were filed. Our office was hired. Attorney Neyman quickly scheduled the case for trial. Today, the day of trial all charges were dismissed after the wife invoked her marital privilege. 

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Bail Reinstated for Man Charged With Multiple Counts of Open and Gross Lewdness

    In July of 2020 the defendant was arrested and charged with multiple counts of open and gross lewdness under G.L. c. 272 section 16. He was placed on conditions of pretrial release that included refraining from the use of alcohol, a trigger for his alleged unlawful behavior. A SCRAMM device was required. In October the defendant was found in violation of his conditions of release when he became severely intoxicated. He was revoked pursuant to G.L. c. 276 section 58B and given the statutory 90 day jail sentence. Attorney Neyman filed a motion under Commonwealth v. Lougee requesting reinstatement of bail and conditions of release. The judge agreed with our request and allowed the motion. The defendant was released from custody. 

    Read More in Bail

  • Drug Possession Case Dismissed After Completion of Diversion Program and Dismissal of Motor Vehicle Crimes

    The defendant is a business owner in central Massachusetts. In November of 2019 she was stopped for operating a motor vehicle that was unregistered and uninsured. The status of the vehicle required it to be towed. During an inventory search the police found methamphetamine, a class B drug in the center console. The operator was arrested and charged with operating uninsured G.L. c. 90 section 34J, operating a motor vehicle with a suspended registration under G.L. c. 90 section 23 and possession of a class B drug in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 34. Our office was hired to represent the defendant. We were able to get the motor vehicle crime dismissed. The prosecutor and the judge agreed to place the defendant in a diversion program under G.L. c. 276A for the drug possession crime. A successful completion of this program will result in a dismissal. 

    Read More in Pretrial Diversion

  • Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery Against Non-Citizen Graduate Student Dismissed

    Our client is working on her PhD at a local top 10 university. In December of 2020 she and her boyfriend got into an argument in their suburban Boston apartment. The argument escalated and became physical. The police were called by another roommate. When they arrived they spoke with the defendant and the victim. The victim had cuts on his face. He complained that his girlfriend, our client struck him during the argument. Our client was also interviewed. She admitted that there was an argument but she refused to comment on the specifics. She was arrested and charged with one count of domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Attorney Stephen Neyman was hired. Recognizing the "victim" had a Fifth Amendment privilege we quickly scheduled a trial date for today. The victim appeared, asserted his privilege and the case was dismissed. 

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Pretrial Probation for South Shore Massachusetts Business Owner Charged With Felony and Misdemeanor Distribution of THC Oil and Marijuana

    The defendant is the owner of a business that has been struggling for the past year. Anonymous tips made him the focal point of a south shore Massachusetts drug investigation. The investigating department believed that the business problems provided a motive for the man to resort to drug sales. In January the officers learned that the defendant would be conducting sales of drugs at a local mall. Their source was corroborated when the defendant drove to the parking lot and met with other known drug dealers. The parties entered a restaurant in the mall and exited an hour later. In doing so all parties entered the defendant's car. The defendant drove the vehicle to a remote location in the parking lot. He stopped and retrieved a bag from the trunk. He then drove the other men back to their car and left the lot. The officers believed that they had just witnessed a drug transaction. Our client was stopped and found to be in possession of a large sum of money. The other individuals were stopped. A search of their car revealed the bag that our client had taken from his trunk. The bag contained a sufficient amount of drugs. Our client was consequently charged with distribution of class D in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 32C and distribution of Class C in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 32B. The former is a misdemeanor and the latter a felony in accordance with Massachusetts law. Our office was able to get pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87 on each count. This case will be dismissed in a few months. 

    Read More in Pretrial Probation

  • Pretrial Probation for Man Charged With Two Counts of Drug Distribution

    In August of 2019 members of a drug task force in the city of Boston were patrolling and conducting surveillance in a part of the city known for high incidents of drug distribution activity. Officers observed our client pick up a known drug user, circle around the block and drop the individual back at the same location. The incident lasted a few minutes. Believing they had just witnessed a drug transaction the officers converged on the buyer. They interrogated him. He quickly revealed that he had just purchased heroin and cocaine from our client. Other  members of the surveillance stopped our client. In plain view they observed drugs packaged identically to the drugs just seized from the buyer. Our client was arrested and charged with two counts of distribution of drugs, cocaine and heroin respectively. These are drug crimes in Massachusetts under G.L. c. 94C section 32 and G.L. c. 94C section 32A. Attorney Neyman was retained to defend this case. Today, the district attorney agreed to pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87. All charges will be dismissed in a few months.

    Read More in Drug Crimes

  • Petition to Seal Allowed for Car Dealership Owner Charged With Drug Distribution

    Our client owns a large car dealership in a Boston suburb. A few years ago he was charged with three counts of distribution of a class B drug in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 32A and possessing a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 269 section 10(b). Attorney Neyman prevailed on a motion to suppress an illegal search and seizure and the prosecution was unable to proceed with its case. The district attorney's office filed a nolle prosse. Our client asked us to petition to seal his case under G.L. c. 276 section 100. We filed the petition on Monday. A hearing was scheduled for today and the judge agreed to allow the petition. The matter is now sealed. 

    Read More in Sealing Criminal Records 

  • Pretrial Probation for Local Business Owner Charged With Possession of Class B Drug and Conspiracy to Violate Massachusetts Drug Laws

    In September of 2020 members of a university police department were monitoring activity on campus consistent with drug sales. They contacted the city police department for assistance. Both agencies formed a surveillance operation during which they observed what they perceived to be drug transactions. During one of the deals the police saw our client, a local business owner seated in the passenger seat of a car buying drugs. After the deal was consummated, the police approached our client and found several oxycodone pills in his lap and on the floor of the car underneath where he was sitting. Our client was arrested and charged with possession of a class B drug pursuant to G.L. c. 94C section 34 and conspiracy to violate the Massachusetts drug laws under G.L. c. 94C section 40. Attorney Stephen Neyman was hired to defend this man. Today, the district attorney and the judge agreed with a pretrial probation disposition under G.L. c. 276 section 87. All charges will be officially dismissed in a few months. 

    Read More in Drug Crimes

  • Charges of Assault and Battery by Means of a Dangerous Weapon and Assault and Battery Dismissed

    On July 11, 2020 police in a city south of Boston received a call for a domestic disturbance. The reporting party is the defendant's wife who told the police that her husband and son got into a physical altercation. When the officers arrived at the scene they were immediately met by the victim who was crying and visibly injured. He reported that his father, the defendant, had been verbally abusive to his mother. This resulted in the father and son arguing. The argument became physical. Witnesses observed the father beat his son with his fists and a cord. The police arrested the father and charged him with assault and battery in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13A and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, a crime under G.L. c. 265 section 15A. Our office was retained to represent the defendant. Today, Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting all charges dismissed.

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Pretrial Probation for Nurse Charged With Assault and Battery

    The defendant is a nurse at a well known Massachusetts. In May of 2020 police in a Boston suburb responded to a call on which the caller hung up. They arrived to find the defendant, very upset and claiming that the police were not needed. Sensing something was wrong the officers persisted in their questioning. The defendant admitted to having stress due to the recent quarantine orders. She further stated that she and her boyfriend were experiencing struggles in their relationship. Officers observed school aged children in the home and interviewed them separate from the defendant. Their interviews disclosed that the defendant, their mother, had been physically abusive with them. The defendant's boyfriend corroborated the children's accounts. The police arrested our client and charged her with assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13A. Attorney Stephen Neyman was hired to represent the defendant. Today, pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87 was imposed. All charges will soon be dismissed. The defendant will not have any collateral consequences with her employer. 

    Read More in Pretrial Probation 

  • Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery Against Non-Citizen Dismissed

    On September 20, 2020 police were dispatched to an apartment complex for a report of a domestic disturbance. They were met by the victim who was the wife of our client. She was the person who made the 911 call. The wife claimed that the defendant complained about the quality of her cooking which in turn caused the two to argue. After an exchange of verbal assaults our client pushed the victim. The pushing continued and prompted the victim to make the call to the police. According to the police report our client did not refute the accusations. He was arrested and charged with domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. He immediately retained our office. Our client is a non-citizen so in order to avoid the possibility of deportation the case needed to be dimissed. Today, all charges were dismissed. 

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery and Assault and Battery Means of a Dangerous Weapon to be Dismissed After Pretrial Probation

    Nearly two years ago the defendant and his girlfriend were in Massachusetts visiting for the weekend. They were staying at an upscale hotel having drinks in the bar. The two started arguing. The dispute escalated and the defendant then struck the victim with her purse in the back of the head. The police were called. The woman claimed that the defendant had been violent with her in the past. Two employees of the hotel bar claimed to have witnessed the attack as well. Our client was located in his room and arrested. He was charged with domestic assault and battery G.L. c. 265 section 13M and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon under G.L. c. 265 section 15A. Attorney Neyman was hired immediately. After two years of litigation we were able to get the district attorney's office and the judge to agree to pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 section 87. In six months all charges will be dismissed. 

    Read More in Pretrial Probation

  • Conditions of Release and Bail Modified for Defendant Facing Serious Gun Charges

    The defendant is facing serious gun charges in the superior court. He was charged with carrying a firearm without a license to carry under G.L. c. 269 section 10(a), carrying a loaded firearm under G.L. c. 269 10(n)  and eight additional counts including several serious drug charges. He was initially detained under G.L. c. 276 section 58A until he engaged our office to represent him. We have successfully modified his conditions of release several times, most recently to permit him to work out of state and partially eliminate his curfew. 

    Read More in Bail

  • Charges of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer and Resisting Arrest to be Dismissed

    In January of 2020 officers in a suburban Boston police department responded to a wellness call. When they arrived they were met by the defendant who admitted to making the call out of concern for a family member who was now fine. The officers insisted on following through with their investigation. The defendant resisted their efforts. He asked the police to leave. They would not. Consequently, our client pushed one of the officers. The other officers then attempted to arrest our client. He resisted. He was charged with assault and battery on a police officer in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13D and resisting arrest under G.L. c. 268 section 32B. Attorney Neyman was hired to represent the defendant. Today, it was agreed that the matters would be continued without a finding for six months. At that time all charges will be dismissed. 

    Read More in Continuance Without a Finding

  • Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery Against PhD Candidate Dismissed

    The defendant is a PhD candidate with a distinguished military career. On July 7, 2020 he and his girlfriend got into an argument that became physical. In actuality the girlfriend struck and strangled our client leaving significant injuries. Rather than call the police and file a complaint against her our client left. A few hours later he was arrested for domestic assault and battery under G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Apparently the girlfriend discussed this matter with family members who encouraged her to turn the tables on our client. Initially the deception worked. However, once our office became involved we applied for and were given a cross complaint against the girlfriend for three felony charges and a misdemeanor charge. As a result of a mutual exercise of 5th Amendment privileges the prosecution was unable to proceed against either party and all matters were dismissed. 

    Read More in Violent Crimes

  • Charges of Domestic Assault and Battery do Not Issue After Clerk Magistrate Hearing

    Our client is a non-citizen working on her PhD from a top ten university. In September of this year she and her husband got into a heated argument over money. The argument turned violent. Personal items of significant value were destroyed. As the matter escalated the husband called the police. They arrived to find the husband bloodied and injured. He explained that during the incident our client struck him several times. Fortunately, even though an arrest was made no criminal complaint was initially filed. Instead, our client was given a summons for a clerk magistrate hearing for a complaint of domestic assault and battery in violation of G.L. c. 265 section 13M. Attorney Stephen Neyman was hired. Today, after a clerk magistrate hearing, the clerk decided not to issue the complaint. 

    Read More in Domestic Assault and Battery

  • Charges of Drug Possession Dismissed

    Our client is a college professor, tenured and with over forty years at the same university. He has fought addiction problems over the course of his life and has on several occasions been charged with drug possession. Last spring undercover officers were monitoring an area known for high volume drug sales. They observed an Hispanic male making contact with our client who at that time was on foot. The officers lost sight of our client only to find him minutes later lighting a homemade pipe and smoking a substance they believed to be drugs. Upon further investigation the police learned that the substance was crack cocaine and our client was arrested. He was charged with possession of a class B substance in violation of G.L. c. 94C section 34. He hired Attorney Stephen Neyman immediately. Today we succeeded in getting all charges dismissed. 

    Read More in Drug Crimes

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case." A.C. Boston, Massachusetts
★★★★★
"I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career." Melissa C. Cold Spring, New York, October 2013
★★★★★
"My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job." Bart L. S.
★★★★★
"The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life." Jacquille D. Brockton, Massachusetts
★★★★★
"In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record." Paul W. Boston, Massachusetts