<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs - Stephen Neyman]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/categories/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/categories/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Stephen Neyman's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 17:00:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute a Class B Substance Charges Dismissed on the Day of Trial]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-a-class-b-substance-charges-dismissed-on-the-day-of-trial/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-a-class-b-substance-charges-dismissed-on-the-day-of-trial/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2025]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the spring of 2023 our client was pulled over by a police officer who, after conducting a random query, learned that our client was operating with a suspended driver’s license. Our client had no idea that his license had been suspended. Apparently, his identity had been stolen and someone using this information in another&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>In the spring of 2023 our client was pulled over by a police officer who, after conducting a random query, learned that our client was operating with a suspended driver’s license. Our client had no idea that his license had been suspended. Apparently, his identity had been stolen and someone using this information in another state was the root of the problem. Our client argued with the police officer who, in retaliation, arrested him. Our client was searched and processed without incident. After the booking process was completed, the officer found over 70 grams of cocaine on the floor in his cruiser right in front of the spot where our client was sitting. He was initially charged with <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/drug-trafficking-in-massachusetts/">trafficking cocaine</a> in violation of <a href="/massachusetts-general-laws/massachusetts-g-l-c-94c-32e-trafficking-in-marijuana-cocaine-her/">G.L. c. 94C section 32E</a>. We convinced the district attorney’s office to break the case down to <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">possession with intent to distribute</a>, <a href="/massachusetts-general-laws/g-l-c-94c-32-class-a-controlled-substance-offenses-involving-dis/">G.L. c. 94 C section 32A</a> and keep the case in the district court. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get the case dismissed. </p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/">Drug Crimes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs and Conspiracy Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/dudley-district-court-charges-of-possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-and-conspiracy-dismissed/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/dudley-district-court-charges-of-possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-and-conspiracy-dismissed/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2018]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On June 24, 2018 Attorney Neyman argued a motion to suppress an unlawful search and seizure involving an exit order. The judge allowed the motion and all drug evidence was suppressed. The man had been charged with possession with intent to distribute a class C drug, G.L. c. 94C Section 32B and conspiracy to violate&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On June 24, 2018 Attorney Neyman argued a motion to suppress an unlawful search and seizure involving an exit order. The judge allowed the motion and all drug evidence was suppressed. The man had been charged with <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">possession with intent to distribute</a> a class C drug, G.L. c. 94C Section 32B and <a href="https://www.massachusetts-drug-crimes-lawyers.com/conspiracy.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">conspiracy</a> to violate the controlled substance laws, G.L. c. 94C Section 40. Once the motion was allowed the prosecution could not use the drug evidence that had been seized. Consequently, today our office was able to get all charges dismissed. </p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/">Drug Crimes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute Cocaine to be Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/somerville-district-court-charges-of-possession-with-intent-to-distribute-cocaine-to-be-dismissed/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/somerville-district-court-charges-of-possession-with-intent-to-distribute-cocaine-to-be-dismissed/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2018]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The defendant is a twenty-four year old construction worker with superior court convictions for violent crimes. On September 8, 2017 undercover police officers in Medford, Massachusetts were conducting a surveillance of a parking lot where a significant number of drug transactions had been reported. These officers knew the defendant from past encounters and knew him&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The defendant is a twenty-four year old construction worker with superior court convictions for violent crimes. On September 8, 2017 undercover police officers in Medford, Massachusetts were conducting a surveillance of a parking lot where a significant number of drug transactions had been reported. These officers knew the defendant from past encounters and knew him to sell drugs. They observed the defendant drive into the parking lot and make contact with occupants of another vehicle. The defendant then entered that vehicle and made movements suggesting a transfer of an object for another object. The experience of these officers suggested a drug transaction was underway. They got out of their undercover vehicle and approached the vehicle the defendant had entered. Upon reaching the vehicle they observed the defendant in possession of a large quantity of a white powdery substance they believed to be cocaine. He was arrested and charged with <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">possession with intent to distribute a class B substance</a>, cocaine. This is a crime under G.L. c. 94C Section 32A. Attorney Neyman was able to get the case continued without a finding. There will be no conviction once the probationary period is over and the defendant will not having a loss of license.</p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/massachusetts-continuance-without-a-finding/">CWOF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Personal Recognizance for Man Charged With Possession With Intent to Distribute Cocaine]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/somerville-district-court-personal-recognizance-man-charged-possession-intent-distribute-cocaine/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/somerville-district-court-personal-recognizance-man-charged-possession-intent-distribute-cocaine/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2017]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The defendant is a twenty year old man on probation for a Superior Court stabbing conviction. Two nights ago he was observed getting into a car at a location known for heavy drug distribution activities. A local police task force had established a surveillance at that location. When they saw the defendant get into the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The defendant is a twenty year old man on probation for a Superior Court stabbing conviction. Two nights ago he was observed getting into a car at a location known for heavy drug distribution activities. A local police task force had established a surveillance at that location. When they saw the defendant get into the car they believed he was engaging in a drug deal. They descended on the car and caught him with six bags of cocaine and an amount of money consistent with drug sales activities. Today he was arraigned in the district court and after a <a href="/practice-areas/bail-hearings/">bail argument</a> released on personal recognizance.</p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">Possession With Intent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D and Carrying a Dangerous Weapon Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/barnstable-district-court-charges-possession-intent-distribute-class-d-carrying-dangerous-weapon-dismissed/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/barnstable-district-court-charges-possession-intent-distribute-class-d-carrying-dangerous-weapon-dismissed/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On July 18, 2016 a Massachusetts State Trooper on patrol observed a car being operated by the defendant driving 79 in a 55 limit zone. The officer stopped the vehicle and contacted the operator. The trooper noted a strong odor of marijuana coming from inside the car. He asked the defendant if he had any&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On July 18, 2016 a Massachusetts State Trooper on patrol observed a car being operated by the defendant driving 79 in a 55 limit zone. The officer stopped the vehicle and contacted the operator. The trooper noted a strong odor of marijuana coming from inside the car. He asked the defendant if he had any marijuana. The defendant admitted to possession of 20 grams that he produced from a backpack in the back seat of his car. While doing so the trooper saw a knife in the defendant’s possession. He also saw a scale in plain view. The defendant was arrested and charged with<a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/"> possession with the intent to distribute marijuana</a> , G.L. c. 94C Section 32C and possession of a dangerous weapon in violation of G.L. c. 269 Section 10(b). Today. Attorney Neyman was able to get both charges dismissed.</p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/">Drug Crimes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent, Cocaine and School Zone Offense Dismissed After Successful Motion to Suppress]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/falmouth-district-court-possession-intent-cocaine-school-zone-offense-dismissed-successful-motion-suppress/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/falmouth-district-court-possession-intent-cocaine-school-zone-offense-dismissed-successful-motion-suppress/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In June of 2015 the defendant was pulled over by a Falmouth Police Officer for driving a vehicle with an illegible license plate. After the stop the officer smelled the odor of unburnt marijuana coming from the defendant who happened to be clinging to a backpack. The defendant was operating without insurance, an arrestable offense.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>In June of 2015 the defendant was pulled over by a Falmouth Police Officer for driving a vehicle with an illegible license plate. After the stop the officer smelled the odor of unburnt marijuana coming from the defendant who happened to be clinging to a backpack. The defendant was operating without insurance, an arrestable offense. The officer called for backup. Another officer arrived with a drug sniffing dog. The dog hit on the backpack. Officers then searched the backpack and found in excess of eight grams of cocaine, enough to satisfy a trafficking charge. Attorney was able to get the prosecution to keep the case in the district court and drop the charges to <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">possession with intent</a> in violation of G.L. c. 94C Section 32C. We filed a motion to suppress the stop and seizure. Today, we prevailed on that motion and all drug charges were dismissed.</p>
 <p>Read More in <a href="/practice-areas/search-seizure/">Search and Seizure</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent Charges Against College Student Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/waltham-district-court-possession-intent-charges-college-student-dismissed/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/waltham-district-court-possession-intent-charges-college-student-dismissed/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On September 20, 2014 members of the Weston, Massachusetts police department made a motor vehicle stop of a car purportedly swerving across the solid double yellow lines on Route 20. The operator of the vehicle, a local college student, produced identification indicating that he was nineteen years old. Officers observed bottles of beer and vodka&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>On September 20, 2014 members of the Weston, Massachusetts police department made a motor vehicle stop of a car purportedly swerving across the solid double yellow lines on Route 20. The operator of the vehicle, a local college student, produced identification indicating that he was nineteen years old. Officers observed bottles of beer and vodka in the backseat of the car. The car was subsequently searched. Officers located seven individually packaged bags of marijuana believed to be <a href="/practice-areas/drug-crimes/possession-with-intent-to-distribute-drugs-in-massachusetts/">possessed with the intent to distribute</a> the drug. Subsequently, the defendant was arrested. Even though the defendant is a college student he is not a citizen and a conviction or a continuance without a finding could result in denial of naturalization or deportation. The man hired Attorney Stephen Neyman. Today, all charges were dismissed outright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Possession With the Intent to Distribute Forty Six Pounds Marijuana Against California Man Continued Without a Finding]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/boston-municipal-court-charges-possession-intent-distribute-forty-six-pounds-marijuana-california-man-continued-without-finding/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/boston-municipal-court-charges-possession-intent-distribute-forty-six-pounds-marijuana-california-man-continued-without-finding/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 20:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boston Police drug control unit detectives investigate a drug distribution operation involving the delivery of large packages of marijuana to various hotels. On April 3, 2013 a package delivered to one of these hotels in the defendant’s name was found to contain twelve pounds of marijuana. On April 11, 2013 another package delivered to the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Boston Police drug control unit detectives investigate a drug distribution operation involving the delivery of large packages of marijuana to various hotels. On April 3, 2013 a package delivered to one of these hotels in the defendant’s name was found to contain twelve pounds of marijuana. On April 11, 2013 another package delivered to the same hotel and addressed to the same person was intercepted. This package contained nearly twenty pounds of marijuana. The defendant was questioned by the police at the hotel and refused to answer without his lawyer being present. About a week later, on April 17, 2013 another package was received by another posh downtown Boston hotel. This one was also addressed to the defendant. The next day, the defendant arrived at the hotel inquiring about the package. Undercover Boston police then arrested him. This package contained fourteen pounds of marijuana. The total weight of all packages was 46 pounds. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get these cases continued without a finding. One year from now they will all be dismissed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Pretrial probation for Boston man charged with Possession With Intent to Distribute Class A, C and D Drugs]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/brighton-district-court-pretrial-probation-boston-man-charged-possession-intent-distribute-class-c-d-drugs/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/brighton-district-court-pretrial-probation-boston-man-charged-possession-intent-distribute-class-c-d-drugs/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The prosecution alleged that on September 22, 2013 Boston police received information that there was a fight going on at a known drug house in Brighton. The officers encountered the defendant, out of breath and complaining that he was just assaulted at knifepoint. A protective sweep of the house was conducted during which the officers&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The prosecution alleged that on September 22, 2013 Boston police received information that there was a fight going on at a known drug house in Brighton. The officers encountered the defendant, out of breath and complaining that he was just assaulted at knifepoint. A protective sweep of the house was conducted during which the officers located marijuana, a Class D drug in plain view. They also found a digital scale and drug packaging materials. The officers continued their search during which they found a significant quantity of heroin, a Class A drug and some mushrooms, a Class C drug. The defendant was the listed tenant of the home of the home and he was arrested and charged with possession with the intent to distribute these substances. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get him pretrial probation meaning that if he remains free from criminal legal trouble all charges will be dismissed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Drug Possession With the Intent to Distribute, Conspiracy and Resisting Arrest All to be Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/13/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/13/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>South Boston District Court: On February 22, 2013, a Massachusetts postal inspector notified Boston Police about a package suspected of containing drugs being delivered to a posh downtown Boston hotel. As a result, a canine sniff was performed. The dog hit on the package. The hotel was then contacted to see if the addressee was&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>South Boston District Court: On February 22, 2013, a Massachusetts postal inspector notified Boston Police about a package suspected of containing drugs being delivered to a posh downtown Boston hotel. As a result, a canine sniff was performed. The dog hit on the package. The hotel was then contacted to see if the addressee was a registered guest. Hotel security was able to determine that there were several people listed for this room. Consequently a controlled delivery was arranged. Once the package was delivered the officers descended on the defendant. A search of the box disclosed over twenty-five pounds of marijuana. The defendant was arrested and in the process acted in a way that warranted charging Resisting Arrest in addition to the Possession With Intent to Distribute Marijuana charges. Today, Stephen Neyman was able to get the client a continuance without a finding. All charges will be dismissed in a few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Drug Charges, Possession With Intent to Distribute Class A, Conspiracy, School Zone Violation Against New York Man Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/26/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/26/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Conspiracy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drug Crimes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Quincy District Court: According to a Braintree Police Department report on August 9, 2011, based on an informant’s tip, police officers set up surveillance activities on a Braintree, Massachusetts street. At approximately 1:35 p.m. officers saw a particular vehicle enter the area of concern. The car had been identified by the informant as the vehicle&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Quincy District Court: According to a Braintree Police Department report on August 9, 2011, based on an informant’s tip, police officers set up surveillance activities on a Braintree, Massachusetts street. At approximately 1:35 p.m. officers saw a particular vehicle enter the area of concern. The car had been identified by the informant as the vehicle used by the defendant to deliver drugs. Surveillance continued. Officers saw the driver, the defendant, deliver drugs to known drug users. One of the users to whom the accused sold drugs was stopped by the officers. This person identified the defendant as having just sold him drugs. Officers found drugs in this person’s possession and recognized the package as the item the defendant passed to this person. The surveillance team followed the defendant and arrested him. In his possession the police found proceeds from the drug deal. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get all charges dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Possession With the Intent to Distribute Marijuana, Drug Conspiracy, Against Tyngsborough, Massachusetts Man to be Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/48/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/48/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Lowell District Court: In June of 2012 an investigation involving a Marijuana Trafficking Conspiracy commenced in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts. A local postal inspector called the police when he learned that a thirty three year old man was shipping large amounts of cash to California and Nevada. The inspector also noticed that the defendant was frequently picking&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Lowell District Court: In June of 2012 an investigation involving a <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382626.html">Marijuana Trafficking</a> Conspiracy commenced in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts. A local postal inspector called the police when he learned that a thirty three year old man was shipping large amounts of cash to California and Nevada. The inspector also noticed that the defendant was frequently picking up boxes. A drug sniffing dog confirmed that the packages mailed to our client contained marijuana. The police established surveillance at the postal station and observed the defendant entering the facility. The officers searched the defendant’s car and found large amounts of marijuana in a duffel bag. The marijuana and large quantities of cash were seized. Additional packages containing marijuana and addressed to the defendant were seized as well. Today, <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1370749.html">Attorney Neyman</a> was able to get the case continued without a finding. If the defendant does not get into trouble with Ferthe criminal legal system for the next two years the charges will be dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Heroin Trafficking, Conspiracy Charges Dismissed Against Milford, Massachusetts Woman, Possession With Intent to Distribute Class A to be Dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/51/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/51/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drug Trafficking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Milford District Court: In March of 2012 an informant told Massachusetts State Police Officers that an individual, one of the co-defendants had been selling Class A drugs in Massachusetts. Surveillance was established to corroborate the representations of the informant. Once verified the officers acted on additional tips. This time they saw the woman, our client&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Milford District Court: In March of 2012 an informant told Massachusetts State Police Officers that an individual, one of the co-defendants had been <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382630.html">selling Class A drugs in Massachusetts</a>. Surveillance was established to corroborate the representations of the informant. Once verified the officers acted on additional tips. This time they saw the woman, our client actively engaged in the distribution of narcotics with the co-defendant, her boyfriend. The officers confronted our client and located a significant amount of a Class A substance, sufficient to satisfy the Trafficking threshold. Our client and two others were arrested and charged with Trafficking Class a Class A Substance and Conspiracy to Violate the Controlled Substances Act. Today, Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting the Trafficking and Conspiracy charges dismissed. A charge of Possession With the Intent to Distribute Drugs was continued without a finding. If the defendant remains free from trouble that charge too will be dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Felony Drug Charges, Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D Dismissed Against Local Man]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/59/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/59/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Hingham District Court: On April 18, 2012 members of a south shore police department executed a search warrant at the home of our client. Upon gaining access to the home officers contacted the defendant who directed them to the location where he was storing drugs and drug distribution paraphernalia. Officers seized drugs, scales, packaging agents,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Hingham District Court: On April 18, 2012 members of a south shore police department executed a search warrant at the home of our client. Upon gaining access to the home officers contacted the defendant who directed them to the location where he was storing drugs and drug distribution paraphernalia. Officers seized drugs, scales, packaging agents, cuff sheets, suboxone and over one pound of marijuana. The defendant was charged with <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382630.html">Possession with the Intent to Distribute Class D</a> along with related Massachusetts <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1370275.html">Drug Crimes</a>. Attorney Denise Dolan from our office prepared and successfully argued a Motion to Suppress. Today all charges were dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Motion to suppress evidence allowed in marijuana distribution and Class B drug possession case]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/65/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/65/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Hingham District Court: Police obtained a warrant to search our client’s home for evidence of suspected sale of marijuana and other drugs. In support of the warrant, police claimed that two confidential informants provided information relative to our client. Police also claimed that the informants made controlled buys in our client’s home. Denise Dolan of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Hingham District Court: Police obtained a warrant to search our client’s home for evidence of suspected <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382630.html">sale of marijuana and other drugs</a>. In support of the warrant, police claimed that two confidential informants provided information relative to our client. Police also claimed that the informants made controlled buys in our client’s home. Denise Dolan of our office argued that the warrant was invalid as based on stale information from unreliable informants and that the informants were acting as agents of the police when entering our client’s home. The court agreed and allowed our motion to suppress everything recovered as a result of the invalid warrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Motion to dismiss school zone drug violation allowed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/67/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/67/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brockton District Court: Our client was charged with distribution of Class B drugs in a school zone. Until August of 2012, the school zone violation triggering distance was 1,000 feet. On August 2, 2012, the legislature passed the “Three Strikes” law, which reduced the school zone range to 300 feet. It was alleged that our&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Brockton District Court: Our client was charged with <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382630.html"> distribution of Class B drugs in a school zone</a>. Until August of 2012, the school zone violation triggering distance was 1,000 feet. On August 2, 2012, the legislature passed the “Three Strikes” law, which reduced the school zone range to 300 feet. It was alleged that our client was selling drugs within 633 feet of a school. The prosecution took the position that the old law should be applicable because the complaint issued prior to enactment of the law. Denise Dolan of our office argued that the new law was applicable retroactively to pending cases. Today, the motion was allowed and the school zone portion of the complaint, which carries a mandatory minimum sentence, was dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of possession with intent to distribute heroin in a school zone dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/75/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/75/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence District Court: Police responded to a report of two people shooting up drugs in a hospital parking lot. The prosecution alleged that a security officer approached our client, the driver, and found him holding a syringe in one hand and a clear baggie containing a brown substance believed to be heroin in the other.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Lawrence District Court: Police responded to a report of two people shooting up drugs in a hospital parking lot. The prosecution alleged that a security officer approached our client, the driver, and found him holding a syringe in one hand and a clear baggie containing a brown substance believed to be heroin in the other. When police arrived, they observed a clear baggie in the in the driver’s side door. Police found another baggie containing a brown substance in our client’s pocket, totaling approximately 7 grams of suspected heroin. He was charged with <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382628.html"> possession of heroin</a>, <a href="http://www.neymanlaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1382630.html"> possession with intent to distribute heroin </a>, and a school zone violation. Denise Dolan of our office convinced the prosecution to dismiss the intent to distribute and school zone charges outright and to dismiss the possession charge upon payment of court costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of possession with intent to distribute drugs, drug distribution, drug possession, school zone violation, and drug conspiracy dismissed after successful motion to suppress]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/97/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/97/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession of Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Worcester District Court: About a month ago, a motion to suppress evidence and statements was allowed by this court. Today, the prosecution realized that it could not continue with this case after the evidence was suppressed. The charges have been dismissed.</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Worcester District Court: About a month ago, a motion to suppress evidence and statements was allowed by this court. Today, the prosecution realized that it could not continue with this case after the evidence was suppressed. The charges have been dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of marijuana distribution and possession with intent to be dismissed, school zone violations and Class B drug possession charges dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/122/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/122/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession of Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>West Roxbury District Court: It was alleged that our client came into contact with an undercover police officer through Craigslist and eventually sold marijuana to the officer during a transaction in our client’s car. Shortly after, the car was searched, and additional marijuana and oxycodone pills were recovered from the trunk and console. The transaction&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>West Roxbury District Court: It was alleged that our client came into contact with an undercover police officer through Craigslist and eventually sold marijuana to the officer during a transaction in our client’s car. Shortly after, the car was searched, and additional marijuana and oxycodone pills were recovered from the trunk and console. The transaction allegedly occurred within 15 feet of a park. Our client had a criminal history of drug offenses dating back to 1999 and through 2006. Our office was able to get the school zone violations and the possession charges dismissed. The other counts were continued without a finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D, School Zone Violation Dismissed Against College Student]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/127/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/127/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Wrentham District Court: The prosecution alleged that on September 16, 2011 local college campus police were dispatched to a dorm for a complaint of loud noise and a student being locked out of his room. Upon arrival the officers detected the odor of fresh marijuana. The officers knocked on the door and the students inside&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Wrentham District Court: The prosecution alleged that on September 16, 2011 local college campus police were dispatched to a dorm for a complaint of loud noise and a student being locked out of his room. Upon arrival the officers detected the odor of fresh marijuana. The officers knocked on the door and the students inside the room gave the police permission to enter. The odor of marijuana increased upon their entry. Stems and seeds were in plain view. Officers continued a search throughout the room and noticed a duffel bag with a ziplock bag sticking out. Torn baggies were found, a scale and a box cutter. A safe was also located and permission to open and search the safe was given. Inside the safe was a larger quantity of marijuana contained in several equally weighed packages. Charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D and a School Zone Violation were filed. Attorney Neyman was hired. Today, the felony charges were dismissed and a lesser charge of simple possession was continued without a finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>