<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[2011 - Stephen Neyman]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/categories/2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/categories/2011/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Stephen Neyman's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:11:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of operating an uninsured vehicle and operating an unregistered motor vehicle dismissed after clerk’s hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/126/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/126/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Operating an Uninsured Motor Vehicle]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Dorchester District Court: Our client, a Boston software developer, was stopped by state police for driving an unregistered vehicle. His insurance had been cancelled as a result of a missed payment. Police sought a criminal complaint. At a clerk’s hearing today, our office succeeded in getting the complaint application dismissed.</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Dorchester District Court: Our client, a Boston software developer, was stopped by state police for driving an unregistered vehicle. His insurance had been cancelled as a result of a missed payment. Police sought a criminal complaint. At a clerk’s hearing today, our office succeeded in getting the complaint application dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D, School Zone Violation Dismissed Against College Student]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/127/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/127/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Wrentham District Court: The prosecution alleged that on September 16, 2011 local college campus police were dispatched to a dorm for a complaint of loud noise and a student being locked out of his room. Upon arrival the officers detected the odor of fresh marijuana. The officers knocked on the door and the students inside&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Wrentham District Court: The prosecution alleged that on September 16, 2011 local college campus police were dispatched to a dorm for a complaint of loud noise and a student being locked out of his room. Upon arrival the officers detected the odor of fresh marijuana. The officers knocked on the door and the students inside the room gave the police permission to enter. The odor of marijuana increased upon their entry. Stems and seeds were in plain view. Officers continued a search throughout the room and noticed a duffel bag with a ziplock bag sticking out. Torn baggies were found, a scale and a box cutter. A safe was also located and permission to open and search the safe was given. Inside the safe was a larger quantity of marijuana contained in several equally weighed packages. Charges of Possession With Intent to Distribute Class D and a School Zone Violation were filed. Attorney Neyman was hired. Today, the felony charges were dismissed and a lesser charge of simple possession was continued without a finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of assault and battery dismissed before arraignment]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/128/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/128/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Assault and Battery]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Woburn District Court: The prosecution alleged that our client beat and injured the alleged victim to the point that the alleged victim had to visit the hospital. Our client and the alleged victim had gotten into an argument because the alleged victim was dancing and flirting with our client’s former boyfriend at a night club.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Woburn District Court: The prosecution alleged that our client beat and injured the alleged victim to the point that the alleged victim had to visit the hospital. Our client and the alleged victim had gotten into an argument because the alleged victim was dancing and flirting with our client’s former boyfriend at a night club. Today, Denise Dolan of our office succeeded in having the charges dismissed prior to arraignment. There will be no CORI entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of sexual conduct for a fee to be dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/129/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/129/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prostitution, Pimping, and Soliciting]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brockton District Court: The prosecution alleged that our client attempted to pay an undercover police officer for sexual favors. Specifically, it was alleged that after our client had a short conversation with the officer, who was presenting herself as a prostitute, the officer asked our client if he “wanted to party.” Our client responded by&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Brockton District Court: The prosecution alleged that our client attempted to pay an undercover police officer for sexual favors. Specifically, it was alleged that after our client had a short conversation with the officer, who was presenting herself as a prostitute, the officer asked our client if he “wanted to party.” Our client responded by saying that he “just wanted a blow job.” The undercover asked our client how much money he had, and our client offered her $40. The defendant retained our office to represent him, and the charges will be dismissed in six months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of negligent operation so as to endanger dismissed after clerk’s hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/130/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/130/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Operating Negligently So As To Endanger]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Dedham District Court: Police alleged that our client, a local sales professional, accelerated out of sight at a speed of up to 50 mph in a 30 mph zone and sped through an intersection before crashing into a tree. Police determined that our client impacted the tree at 60 mph or more. Police sought a&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Dedham District Court: Police alleged that our client, a local sales professional, accelerated out of sight at a speed of up to 50 mph in a 30 mph zone and sped through an intersection before crashing into a tree. Police determined that our client impacted the tree at 60 mph or more. Police sought a criminal complaint for negligent operation so as to endanger. Our office was able to get the application for those charges dismissed today at a clerk’s hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[School Zone Violation, Drug Conspiracy Charges Dismissed Against Local College Student]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/131/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/131/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drug Crimes]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brookline District Court: The prosecution alleged that on August 6, 2011 a Brookline, Massachusetts police officer was conducting surveillance in a park associated with recent disturbances. The officer observed two males meet up in the park. He overheard them discussing what he believed to be a drug transaction. He then saw one of the males&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Brookline District Court: The prosecution alleged that on August 6, 2011 a Brookline, Massachusetts police officer was conducting surveillance in a park associated with recent disturbances. The officer observed two males meet up in the park. He overheard them discussing what he believed to be a drug transaction. He then saw one of the males open a ziplock bag that contained what marijuana. After that he saw a transfer of the substance from that man to another person. The officer effectuated an arrest. He interrogated the individuals and quickly learned that they had just been supplied by another man, a local college student whom surveillance saw driving in the area. Police were dispatched to this person’s home. He was apprehended in a parking lot adjacent to his home. In his possession the police found a large quantity of money and drugs consistent with being possessed for the purpose of sale. The defendant, our client admitted to selling the drugs. Earlier today, Attorney Neyman was able to get the School Zone charge and a Conspiracy charge dismissed. The remaining charge was continued without a finding. If the defendant remains free from criminal trouble for the next six months the case will be dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[OUI Case Against Internet Executive Dismissed Prior to Trial]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/132/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/132/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving, Oui Penalties]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Haverhill District Court: The defendant in this case was a high tech executive working at a large internet company in California. The prosecution alleged that on June 10, 2011, a local police department stopped the woman driving with her high beams on and without any taillights. The officer immediately detected an odor of alcohol and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Haverhill District Court: The defendant in this case was a high tech executive working at a large internet company in California. The prosecution alleged that on June 10, 2011, a local police department stopped the woman driving with her high beams on and without any taillights. The officer immediately detected an odor of alcohol and observed the woman’s eyes to be bloodshot and glassy. She admitted to having been at her class reunion and to have been drinking. She failed three out of four field sobriety tests. A portable breathalyzer test resulted in a .095 reading. She was charged with OUI. The woman retained Attorney Stephen Neyman to defend her. The case was scheduled for trial today. Our office was able to get the case dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Sexual Conduct for a Fee Dismissed Against Boston Real Estate Developer Prior to Arraignment]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/133/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/133/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prostitution, Pimping, and Soliciting]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boston Municipal Court: The prosecution alleged that on July 19, 2011 Boston Police Detectives were conducting an investigation into prostitution activities using backpage.com. Officers contacted and identified a female who was heavily entrenched into advertising her services, fees and locations for conducting business. An undercover operative learned that the woman was from Sacramento, California and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Boston Municipal Court: The prosecution alleged that on July 19, 2011 Boston Police Detectives were conducting an investigation into prostitution activities using backpage.com. Officers contacted and identified a female who was heavily entrenched into advertising her services, fees and locations for conducting business. An undercover operative learned that the woman was from Sacramento, California and traveled extensively to avoid detection and diversify her clientele. She would move throughout major cities, staying for a few days and making a significant sum for her services. During the course of the investigation it was learned that a major Boston real estate developer was regularly using her services when she came to Boston. This was confirmed through credit card receipts, surveillance and ultimately the woman’s identification after her apprehension. The defendant hired our office to defend him. He received a summons to appear in court today. Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting the charges dismissed prior to arraignment. There will be no CORI entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Felony Charges of Malicious Destruction to Property Over $250 and charges of Breaking and Entering dismissed against Boston advertising executive]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/134/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/134/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Home Invasion]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Roxbury District Court: The prosecution claimed that on April 3, 2011 Boston Police were called for a disturbance. They arrived to find the first floor window of a home totally smashed in and the interior of the home ripped apart. The living room was destroyed, the bedroom ransacked and several household items were broken and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Roxbury District Court: The prosecution claimed that on April 3, 2011 Boston Police were called for a disturbance. They arrived to find the first floor window of a home totally smashed in and the interior of the home ripped apart. The living room was destroyed, the bedroom ransacked and several household items were broken and on the floor. Witnesses at the scene identified our client as the person who committed these acts. Complaints for felony Malicious Destruction to Property Over $250 and charges of Breaking and Entering issued. Today Attorney Neyman succeeded in getting all charges dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Harassment Prevention Order does not issue against South Shore developer]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/135/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/135/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Stalking and Criminal Harassment]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Plymouth District Court: The complainant alleged that our client, a developer from the South Shore cut down a substantial amount of trees on her property. She further alleged that on several occasions our client shouted obscenities at her and approached her in a threatening manner. The abuse continued for a one year period causing the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Plymouth District Court: The complainant alleged that our client, a developer from the South Shore cut down a substantial amount of trees on her property. She further alleged that on several occasions our client shouted obscenities at her and approached her in a threatening manner. The abuse continued for a one year period causing the complainant severe emotional problems warranting mental health treatment. Also, on several occasions the complainant called the police who in turn suggested that she and her husband apply for a Harassment Prevention Order. They did. Earlier today a hearing was held in the Plymouth District Court. Attorney Neyman was able to prevent the issuance of the Harassment Prevention Order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Assault and Battery on a Police Officer, Resisting Arrest, Assault and Battery and Disorderly Conduct to be dismissed against Boston man]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/136/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/136/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Assault and Battery]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boston Municipal Court: The prosecution alleged that on October 28, 2009 Boston Police were called to a disturbance on Stuart and Warrenton Streets in Boston, Massachusetts. They arrived to find an affray which allegedly involved our client, a local musician. The combatants refused commands to stop and officers got involved in an effort to end&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Boston Municipal Court: The prosecution alleged that on October 28, 2009 Boston Police were called to a disturbance on Stuart and Warrenton Streets in Boston, Massachusetts. They arrived to find an affray which allegedly involved our client, a local musician. The combatants refused commands to stop and officers got involved in an effort to end the fight. According to the police report our client then grabbed a police officer, punched him in the face and in the head. He then threw two to three punches to the officer’s face. An arrest was made and charges were filed. Today, Attorney Neyman was able to get pre-trial probation for the defendant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Road Rage, Malicious Destruction of Property Over $250 against local senior software engineer dismissed after Clerk’s Hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/137/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/137/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Offenses]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Woburn District Court: The prosecution alleged that on July 20, 2011 Massachusetts State Police were notified about a road rage incident having occurred on Route 128 (95) southbound in Woburn, Massachusetts. Police arrived to interview the victim who stated that while jostling for lane access the victim gave our client the finger. The parties exited&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Woburn District Court: The prosecution alleged that on July 20, 2011 Massachusetts State Police were notified about a road rage incident having occurred on Route 128 (95) southbound in Woburn, Massachusetts. Police arrived to interview the victim who stated that while jostling for lane access the victim gave our client the finger. The parties exited the highway, still engaging one another. While at a red light our client got out of his car, confronted the victim and kicked his car. The investigating officer found a shoe print in the side of the car that matched our client’s shoe. The car was significantly damaged. Today, Attorney Neyman succeeded in having the charges dismissed. No complaint will issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Application for shoplifting charges dismissed after clerk’s hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/138/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/138/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Shoplifting]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Salem District Court: Police alleged that our client, a dental hygienist, entered a department store with one of the store’s bags and proceeded to conceal a household appliance in the bag. Our client was apprehended upon leaving the store, and police applied for a criminal shoplifting complaint against her. Denise Dolan of our office represented&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Salem District Court: Police alleged that our client, a dental hygienist, entered a department store with one of the store’s bags and proceeded to conceal a household appliance in the bag. Our client was apprehended upon leaving the store, and police applied for a criminal shoplifting complaint against her. Denise Dolan of our office represented her at a clerk’s hearing today, and the complaint application was dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Application for complaint charging Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle, Failure to Stop for a Police Officer dismissed after Clerk’s Hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/139/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/139/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Failure to Obey a Police Officer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Operating Negligently So As To Endanger]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Wareham District Court: On August 7, 2011 shortly before 6:00 p.m. a Rochester, Massachusetts police officer observed a car traveling 57 in a 40 mile per hour zone. The officer followed the car and activated its lights. The car failed to stop for the officer and continued its high speed of travel for about two&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Wareham District Court: On August 7, 2011 shortly before 6:00 p.m. a Rochester, Massachusetts police officer observed a car traveling 57 in a 40 mile per hour zone. The officer followed the car and activated its lights. The car failed to stop for the officer and continued its high speed of travel for about two miles. The officer eventually effectuated a stop and approached the driver, a recent college graduate and media marketing executive. She was charged with Failing to Stop for a Police Officer and Operating to Endanger. The defendant hired Attorney Stephen Neyman to defend her. After a Clerk’s Hearing all charges were dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of operating after a suspended license dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/140/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/140/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Operating After Suspension or Revocation of License]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brookline District Court: Our client, a local realtor, was stopped by police after an officer ran a check on his license plate, identified him as the registered owner, and discovered that his license was suspended. According to the prosecution, our client’s license had been suspended since April of 2011. Our client was arrested and charged&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Brookline District Court: Our client, a local realtor, was stopped by police after an officer ran a check on his license plate, identified him as the registered owner, and discovered that his license was suspended. According to the prosecution, our client’s license had been suspended since April of 2011. Our client was arrested and charged with operating after suspended license. Denise Dolan of our office was able to get these charges dismissed upon payment of court costs today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[No complaint for woman charged with Leaving the Scene of an Accident, Destruction of Property]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/141/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/141/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Leaving the Scene of an Accident]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Lowell District Court: On March 24, 2011 a Tewksbury, Massachusetts police officer was dispatched to an hysterical woman complaining that she was stopped at the stop sign on Salem Road at Main St. about to bear right onto Main Street when a car being driven by our client came out of no where and hit&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Lowell District Court: On March 24, 2011 a Tewksbury, Massachusetts police officer was dispatched to an hysterical woman complaining that she was stopped at the stop sign on Salem Road at Main St. about to bear right onto Main Street when a car being driven by our client came out of no where and hit her Black Honda CRV on the drivers side door and left quarter panel. The defendant did not stop. The victim got her plate number and called 911. The car being driven by our client was stopped a short time later. Our client was detained. Shortly thereafter she was identified by the victim. Charges of Leaving the Scene of an Accident and Destruction to Property were applied for. Attorney Neyman was able to prevent the issuance of a criminal complaint at a Clerk’s Hearing earlier today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[209A restraining order vacated]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/142/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/142/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Restraining Orders]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brighton District Court: The mother of the defendant’s child sought the extension of an abuse prevention order, claiming that the relationship deteriorated as a result of our client’s drinking habits. She claimed that while drinking, he would become offensive and put her in fear for her physical safety. She claimed that she fled from the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Brighton District Court: The mother of the defendant’s child sought the extension of an abuse prevention order, claiming that the relationship deteriorated as a result of our client’s drinking habits. She claimed that while drinking, he would become offensive and put her in fear for her physical safety. She claimed that she fled from the couple’s California home with their infant son because of this and that since that time, he had contacted her with threatening messages. Today, Denise Dolan of our office was able to get the order vacated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of distribution of a Class C drug to a minor reduced; case continued without a finding]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/143/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/143/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession With Intent to Distribute Drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Milford District Court: It was alleged that our client sold clonazepam pills, a Class C drug, to a minor who ultimately overdosed while at school. After being released from the hospital, the minor provided police with the remaining pills and his cell phone, which contained a series of text messages detailing the drug transaction. Our&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Milford District Court: It was alleged that our client sold clonazepam pills, a Class C drug, to a minor who ultimately overdosed while at school. After being released from the hospital, the minor provided police with the remaining pills and his cell phone, which contained a series of text messages detailing the drug transaction. Our client was charged with distribution of a class C drug to a minor, which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 2 ½ years in state prison or 2 years in the house of correction. Our office was able to get the charge reduced to distribution, and the case was continued without a finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of domestic assault and malicious destruction of property over $250 dismissed]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/144/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/144/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Domestic Assault and Battery]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Falmouth District Court: It was alleged that our client got into an argument with his girlfriend inside of a hotel room, during which he smashed a lamp and assorted items and created three large holes in the wall. It was also alleged that our client caused his girlfriend to fear physical harm as a result&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Falmouth District Court: It was alleged that our client got into an argument with his girlfriend inside of a hotel room, during which he smashed a lamp and assorted items and created three large holes in the wall. It was also alleged that our client caused his girlfriend to fear physical harm as a result of the violent outburst. He was arrested and charged with domestic assault and malicious destruction of property over $250. Today, Denise Dolan of our office was able to get these charges dismissed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charges of Operating to Endanger against Boston businessman dismissed after Clerk’s Hearing]]></title>
                <link>https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/145/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.neymanlaw.com/blog-case-results/145/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of Stephen Neyman Team]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Clerk Magistrate Hearings]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence District Court: The prosecution stated that on July 19, 2011 just before midnight police were dispatched to the scene of an accident on Route 93 northbound. They arrived to find a woman suffering from injuries. An ambulance was called. Witnesses stated that a car being driven by our client was traveling at 70 miles&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Lawrence District Court: The prosecution stated that on July 19, 2011 just before midnight police were dispatched to the scene of an accident on Route 93 northbound. They arrived to find a woman suffering from injuries. An ambulance was called. Witnesses stated that a car being driven by our client was traveling at 70 miles per hour. It failed to brake for a car in front of it. Our client was interrogated by the police at the scene. He admitted to being distracted by his car radio just prior to the crash. Further investigation revealed the presence of Marijuana and Drug Paraphernalia in the car. Attorney Neyman was hired to defend the man at a Clerk’s Hearing. All charges were dismissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>